Emulsifying Brown's Gas

[gotoluc]

Hi goldenequity and everyone who is now part of this important research.

I see some good information going around here and thank everyone for their participation.

Can we not consider any off the self products for this purpose? I'm no chemist that's for sure but I've worked quite a bit on car engines over the years and used degreasers. The product that keeps coming to mind is called Gunk. I don't know if this is a Canadian or American product but it work really well to dissolve grease on engines and the interesting thing was water is what worked best to rinse the grease off. The water would turn into a milky white color, much like the emulsified water fuels we are seeing.

Like I said I'm no chemist so if you know this is not worth the time no need to reply.

Keep up all the great work.

Luc

[gotoluc]

Ooops, wrong thead

[mrsiegel2]

goldenequity

Engineer and businessman.  I open to anyone that can help with the technology.   In fact I would like to hire a bunch of you guys.   I am quite surprised at the analysis done on the technology.  We are quite open and willing to talk.  The only thing is I will not disclose the secret sauce. Also go the the web site and review our battery.  This technology actually makes the 400 mile electric car possible. (www.microbubbletech.com look up CNT battery.)


Michael Siegel

[mrsiegel2]

Kampen

We sell the system. We have various sized systems.

1 - 5 MT/Day
10 MT/Day
30 MT/Day
60 MT/Day
We can go up to 250 MT/Day.

These systems at the present time are out of the price range for the average guy.  It is designed for industrial applications and maritime use.

A distributor would purchase a system and then resell into the market.  Ironically the officials of the large cities in the US are not interested in saving any money.  Presently our biggest orders are coming from areas where the price of diesel is $10 and over per gallon..

Michael Siegel
Micro Bubble Technologies Inc.

[goldenequity]

@ Michael Siegel

Thanks for the compliments to the members, I wish your company success and perhaps someone may want to contact you directly.

I would like to address you on something that perplexes me about the ability of your device and your process.

It's a simple math problem.

As I understand your process, and as you declared in your previous post, let's say your EM-fuel has a mix of 60% Kerosene and 40% water.
As you also declare, and the microscopy shows, you end up with only 4% liquid water within the 60% Kerosene and the REMAINING 36% water is then therefore being declared as having been converted to Hydrogen bubbles and Oxygen bubbles and trapped/isolated separately within the gas emulsion.  Right so far?

So by example, let's say at the input of your Nanomizer,
we simultaneously introduce the 2 liquids (I assume that's how it works) and we input by your ratio, 60 liters of Kerosene along with 40 liters of water.

If your device did NOT split the water into gas...... we would simply end up with 100 liters of a 60/40 blend of liquid.

But your device (except for the 4%) does create the hydrogen/oxygen gases..... so,
that means, in your end product,
we can account for 60 liters of Kerosene, and 4 liters of liquid water,
so ........the remaining 36 liters of water would therefore now have to be in the form of a gas.

We know that if you take 1 liter of liquid water and split all the H20 molecules into hydrogen and oxygen..... you will end up with approximately 1800 liters of gas as the known ratio is roughly 1800:1 (by volume under atmospheric pressure).
So,
Taking the above example, we would have to account for the 36 liters of water that would now have been converted
to (1800 X 36) 64,800 liters of combustible gas!

It doesn't matter how "small" the bubbles are..... volume is still volume and you would have created 64,800 liters of gas volume.
That 64,800 liters of gas can certainly NOT be contained within 64 liters of liquid.
UNLESS during processing, the Nanomizer fails to contain and capture ALL the gas it creates during the processing/electrolysing.
Where else could it go?

I have to use my brain here.
You are NOT converting 36 liters of water to gas in an instant with the Nanomiser and ending up with 64,800 liters of gas... no way.
I suspect you ARE however electrolysing (as we are) and introducing Brown's Gas into the mix..... maybe with 4%-6% water to introduce your surfactant (secret sauce  ).....and the Nanomizer converts maybe 1-2% into gas...... and that's fine with me... it means we're on the right track!  It also means that the actual ratio of actual liquid water to liquid kerosene is probably more like 6/94 (with 2% of the water as gas) 

What am I missing here?  This is a friendly question btw... I really would like to be able to wrap my head around this.
Cheers!