911 , a short clip

[Bulbz]

I think the whole 9-11 thing was horse-shit.

Something definitely smell fishy about the fact that both towers were reduced to rubble. It might have been more believable, if there was only partial collapse of either one of the buildings.

[utilitarian]

The truthers can all go pound sand.  No one believes you, except on fringe boards like this, where people don't believe in the moon landing either.

[HEYDUDE]

Hi Grumpy,

I totally agree with you. In my fourteen years on the internet and countless forums I have belonged to this one has some the most rude members ever.  The "requirement" to be polite goes back to the very best tradition in science, where it used to be assumed that honest, intelligent, well-meaning experimenters could hold unique, and divergent opinions and interpretations regarding the same, observed phenomena. No one was assumed to be "wrong" or "bad" because they held a differing opinion. It created an environment for lively debate and in-depth investigation. The only requirements for this environment to flourish were intelligence and civility.

This is a PUBLIC FORUM. Anyone in the world can view it. It would be SOCIALLY IRRESPONSIBLE to leave posts that disparage a person's character in such a forum. NO ONE has the right to turn this forum into a billboard for their rude and uncivil behavior.

All anyone wants is hard facts or proof with out a doubt, not rummors. All I want is the hard facts and to this date there are none just rummors and I was attacked for it just as you have been over the years. It's sad when a web site gets hijacked as this one has and the site moderator is no where to be seen.

Best Regards,
Fuzzy

After his initial outbursts, it's nice to see that feline is developing manners.

He complains on this thread of everyone's rudeness to him, but go back and check his initial posts ( for his real rudeness display on this thread) to see how far he has now come.

honest, intelligent, well-meaning experimenters could hold unique, and divergent opinions and interpretations regarding the same, observed phenomena. No one was assumed to be "wrong" or "bad" because they held a differing opinion.

I'm sorry, Mr. cat but you didn't have that beneficent attitude in your initial posts, especially the picture you posted (reply #8), citing anyone with an opinion other than yours as having their head up their ass.

[ChileanOne]

Fair enough.

Is this how your theory goes then:  Small scale models of airplanes loaded with missiles crashed into the towers, and during the 17-second delay, computer generated images of full-size airplanes were added to the shots for broadcast. 

If so, I'm not understanding why the perps just didn't use real full-size airplanes with explosives or missiles on board, which would eliminate the need for processing the footage for television (in the short span of 17 seconds!).  That would also eliminate the need for tv networks and photographers to be in on the deal.

Not so fast maiteee!!!

There are some slight problems with your idea:

First, according to many aeronautical experts, including the famous son of the founder of Lear Jet, the alleged speed at which the craft would have hit the towers, is impossible at that altitude, because simply the fans of the motors are not designed to intake that much dense air, so they would choke and the plane fall and being uncontrollable. So, there goes the idea of using real planes.

Second, whatever caused the explosion at the collisions, was not only the possible colliding object, but there were also pre planted charges to cause the plane profile hole, which could not have cause by a real plane, as planes are basically a big alluminum can, and would not have been able to cut the hole they pretended us to believe, so, again, using real planes to cause the damage that was observed was not possible, and the cartoon like hole we saw was just another special FX to increase the drama.

In the Naudet shot of the first collision, a frame by frame analysis shows clearly how the "wing profile" is neatly caused by charges that explode after the initial hit of the "plane", which is IMHO even more embarassing to their poor fakery.

[utilitarian]

Not so fast maiteee!!!

There are some slight problems with your idea:

First, according to many aeronautical experts, including the famous son of the founder of Lear Jet, the alleged speed at which the craft would have hit the towers, is impossible at that altitude, because simply the fans of the motors are not designed to intake that much dense air, so they would choke and the plane fall and being uncontrollable. So, there goes the idea of using real planes.

Second, whatever caused the explosion at the collisions, was not only the possible colliding object, but there were also pre planted charges to cause the plane profile hole, which could not have cause by a real plane, as planes are basically a big alluminum can, and would not have been able to cut the hole they pretended us to believe, so, again, using real planes to cause the damage that was observed was not possible, and the cartoon like hole we saw was just another special FX to increase the drama.

In the Naudet shot of the first collision, a frame by frame analysis shows clearly how the "wing profile" is neatly caused by charges that explode after the initial hit of the "plane", which is IMHO even more embarassing to their poor fakery.

There are also some slight problems with your idea.  Mainly, that you are a complete moron.  But also the following.

Let me see if I get this straight.  So the buildings were rigged to explode, right?  Why not just explode the damn buildings, and just reduce the complexity of this wild ass plot by about 99%?  The terrorists in fact tried to blow up the buildings just a few years prior, so what a believable fake!  But no, they have to involve everyone and their mom in on this super secret and needlessly complex plot.