The Road to Perpetual Motion

[Marctwo]

Aren't we looking for the truth here?

This isn't about taking sides with someone because they have a good rep.  Or taking sides against conventional science because of the bumble bees.  This is about CF magically producing extra energy out of thin air.

If you want to take a side in this then why not take the side of evidence.  Do your own experiments.  You could start by dropping a ball bearing down a u-bend and seeing how much extra energy it has when it pops up the other side.  If Hans is right then it should just keep going... popping up one side then the other with more energy each time.

[AB Hammer]

Greetings Hans

Glad to see this string thumping. I looked at your wm2d s, I find them similar effects to one of mine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhskB-0SjKI
With the weighted arm It ran twice as long with the weighted arm than without. This is just a little addition to the story.

[Marctwo]

@Alan:  With the arm adding more mass to the perimeter of the system, wouldn't you expect it to have more momentum and run for longer?

[TinselKoala]

Can you test the rundown times, with and without the weighted arm, using a calibrated input spin?
I illustrate what I mean in my video of testing the Mondrasek magnet-assisted gravity wheel. This method imparts exactly the same input energy to a wheel each time, and allows run-down time comparisons to be made easily and meaningfully.
It's easy to do and will be much more informative and accurate than a video of "Mr. Hand" giving a wheel a good spin.
Please feel free to download my video and try the method outlined.
http://www.mediafire.com/?wuldel0syug

[Kator01]

Hi Hans,

This thing is not so easy. I had a hard time to get to the bottom of the problem.
I have done all the math already in pequaides thread here in December 2007.

Please read only these two posts of mine.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1995.80

Re: Free energy from gravitation using Newtonian Physic
Ã,« Reply #90 on: December 16, 2007, 09:52:33 PM Ã,»

The whole system including the mass of the sphere attached does not accelerate at 9.81 m exp2/sec as one is led to believe, but much slower. The potential energy present at the beginning of the process which is converted to kinetic energy  is split upon seperation of the two masses depending on the ratio of the masses.

I hope it helps to save time and effort  before you get frustrated by the results of planned experiments.

Please go to this Link and look for the Atwood-Machine-Simulation. This is of utmost importance.

I put it all in here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1995.160

Re: Free energy from gravitation using Newtonian Physic
Ã,« Reply #186 on: February 15, 2008, 11:13:14 PM Ã,»

Kator