Has somebody used Eric Laithwaite 's device ?

[soliris]

The Englishman Eric Laithwaite and the Russian Gennadi Shipov have something in common : they made, each one, gyroscopes on free axis. Lathwaite, rejected by the Royal Society of London because of its results of non-Newtonian physics, sent into space a gyroscope which has accelerated the movement itself, and Shipov made gyroscopes whose energy increased.

The key is to know what "free axis" means, for physicists.

[pequaide]

Well: let me take a shot at the meaning of free axis.

First it does not surprise me at all that the energy of a spinning system would have an energy increase; the cylinder and spheres have huge energy increases. I hope the Royal Society doesn’t think that an energy increase is non-Newtonian: that would be the farthest from the truth.

All gyroscopes have a freely rotating axis so that can not be the meaning of free axis. A gyroscope that is moved from place to place has been done on ships and in space so that is not an anomaly.

My I suggest that free axis may provide for a changing distribution of momentum, from a large mass to a smaller mass. Could it be that portions of the mass have changes in momentum: some parts taking all the motion and other parts coming to rest?

This is very similar to the cylinder and spheres experiments. I see it as a confirmation of this work. 

[soliris]

Hello Mr Pequaide

I just know that the set of Laithwaite turned faster and faster, and took off like an aircraft, to go as a meteor into deep space.
It is true that there are gyroscopes which are made up of several parties, and some of these parts can stop and even go back in the opposite sense ..
In france, during the sixties, we bought "mobiles" to decorate our living rooms, with wires and wooden batons, which turned.

I don't understand when you tell us that there is increased energy in a rotary system ( The density of energy changes, but not the tolal amount ); Lathwaite was excluded from the Royal Society for having challenged the second law of Newton.
The second law says that ,anyway, the energy always comes from elsewhere, from a known part of our universe...To tell the physicists that the energy comes from itself, or from the torsion waves, is sacrilegious...

I have changed the terms " conservation of energy " by " conservation of energy density, " what do you think about that ?

[soliris]

Oh yes, Mr Pequaide, I see your last post on free energy from sphÃÆ'Ã,¨res and cylinders...You guess that the Royal Society could not accept you in its ranks...Interesting, however.

[pese]

http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=Eric+Laithwaite++Gennadi+Shipov&meta=

PESE