The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

[dean_mcgowan]

Looks like we arrived too late. The patient is in a coma. There is some REM (rapid eye movement) signifying there are dreams occurring.  I'm afraid the temporary loss of oxygen to the brain caused the condition.  Whats that twitching?

Just the death throes of an idea that has been tried numerous times before and always fallen flat on its face....without fail.

Very few patients recover from this condition. I give this thread about 40 pages before sobering reality sets in. Meanwhile have fun in the sandbox.

At least 40, just add blinking LED's and maybe something that spins and this could be a record breaker

Dean

[captainpecan]

@ Yucca

I see where you are coming from about the pulse motor. But the effect you mention that are making the results invalid, is not actually as invalid as you may realize. With your theory, if I'm reading you correctly, is that with the higher energy flowing, the other coils are "putting the brakes on the motor" due to the magnetic field not collapsed yet, thus showing less work done.  Actually, in a sense, it is a good comparison to the conventional "short out the battery" circuit that is "putting on the brakes" to every electric motor we are using now.  Hey, if not causing a direct short to battery, will release the brakes on the motor, and make them run more efficient, that's a bonus!

While I agree to some extent the experiments are not perfect by any means, and there could be more ideal methods than I used.  I find it quite false to say it was all worthless by any means.  There are some good points made no matter how it was tested. Many readers here had no idea you could even pass energy THROUGH a motor and use it again.  Forgetting all the equations, sparks, bridge rectifiers, magnets, coils, wires, who cares... There is info in these video's that will make many people grab some materials and hit the bench again.  I think that is a success if you ask me. Even if it only to prove me wrong! Hands on is where the discoveries happen, not in a book.

[broli]

captainpecan you are right. You showed the basic idea now it's up to the rest to go hardcore. There could be so much done electronic wise. Also what are the specs on those coils?

[nievesoliveras]

@all

This circuit I had on my hardisk is related to what captainpecan is doing with a motor added. I tried to replicate it but in the replication I made the motor did not spin, I think beause there are two positives going to the motor.
I think so, because when I added a ground to the small motor, the motor spinned.

Jesus

[Yucca]

@ Yucca

I see where you are coming from about the pulse motor. But the effect you mention that are making the results invalid, is not actually as invalid as you may realize. With your theory, if I'm reading you correctly, is that with the higher energy flowing, the other coils are "putting the brakes on the motor" due to the magnetic field not collapsed yet, thus showing less work done.  Actually, in a sense, it is a good comparison to the conventional "short out the battery" circuit that is "putting on the brakes" to every electric motor we are using now.  Hey, if not causing a direct short to battery, will release the brakes on the motor, and make them run more efficient, that's a bonus!

While I agree to some extent the experiments are not perfect by any means, and there could be more ideal methods than I used.  I find it quite false to say it was all worthless by any means.  There are some good points made no matter how it was tested. Many readers here had no idea you could even pass energy THROUGH a motor and use it again.  Forgetting all the equations, sparks, bridge rectifiers, magnets, coils, wires, who cares... There is info in these video's that will make many people grab some materials and hit the bench again.  I think that is a success if you ask me. Even if it only to prove me wrong! Hands on is where the discoveries happen, not in a book.

I would definitely NOT say it was worthless! I think you are causing many people to learn more about capacitance and charge. But when I see people saying one thing when I am pretty certain it is incorrect I find it difficult to bite my tongue, admitedly it has made me unpopular in various situations throughout my life but nontheless I will always ascribe to the truth no matter what.

If you could achieve work via the motor whilst at the same time conserving your original charge (i.e. end up with 12.73V in each cap) then you would have done it and if you built the 1 watt output device and qualified for the prize then I would gladly pay over my $500 that I have promised to do should the OU prize ever be claimed.

If you think that 9V in two caps is the same as 18V in one cap then you are entitled to that opinion and I won't force my opinion on you any more.

Out of curiosity though what do you think about resonant zero crossing switching circuits to transfer charge, they can achieve quite low loss transfers, like you would end up with 12V or more on each cap, these are not hearsay they are used by switch mode PSUs, would you consider these to be OU?

Yucca.