Canceling Lenz's Law - Methods

[supermuble]

Holy cra* .... Now this person has done some amazing work. The best I've seen.

He says his window motor will run for HOURS on a capacitor.... Dang!

I suppose this has to be just "slightly" over-unity because tiny capacitors cannot run a motor for hours.... This video is proof positive that these motors do defy some conventional limits.

YouTube - Mini Window Motors Capacitor Demonstration.
Edit/Delete Message

[gyulasun]

Hi,

Re on your "...tiny capacitors cannot run a motor for hours..."

See this capacitor: http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/201187493/super_capacitor.html  it has 50 Farad capacitance value in that volume!!!

His window motor you refer to at youtube surely has a few milliAmper average current consumption from a few Volts DC voltage and as such it is surely able to work from even a 10-20 Farad capacitor bank charged up to a few volts.  If his caps are 5.5V rated each, then his resultant working voltage is around 7-8V DC, considering he connected two in series (and  another two series caps in parallel with the other two series to increase current loadability for the bank).  EDIT: I realize that there are only two cpacitors only, not four as I said, I was mistaken by the mirror, lol.

This is the link by the way: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMVtGxSYdhU

So I think it is very much possible to run such low consumption motor from a capacitor bank of a few Farad, it is already practical.

rgds, Gyula

PS  I seem to always shower your parade and I apologize but I try to help and share my understanding on some topics you bring up...  

[supermuble]

Thanks for the corrections.

So regarding a no drag generator. I understand the theory now. If you can move a rotor faster than the coils can reverse their magnetic field, then you can INVERT Lenz's law. It is very very simple. It's all about speed.

If you take a primary coil on a transformer and accelerate it faster than the secondary can respond, then you can INVERT Lenz's law, and instead of drawing MORE current, the primary will draw LESS current.

Of course, this is all in THEORY... I've never done it! 

[sinergicus]

n my seeking to find a way to obtain easy end cheap free energy, I found this patent in PJ book

RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting

This was very interesting to me ,because seems to be very easy to replicate.
My ideea is to put this generator in conjunction with Osiie Calanan free energy unit

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...TYd5jc3ndQJ03w

You can find discussion about this, Here
Radiant Free Energy By Ossie Callanan

Excerpt from patent:

"This unique way of generating electricity allows generation of more electrical power, e.g. anywhere in the
range of 4 to 137 times more power, than prior, conventional means. It also has the advantage of obtaining
unity power with very little effort. "

With this type of generator,no need shaft torque to fight against lenz force.
We can recover entire energy from Ossie Callanan motor-generator section
and in the same time,we will have common power usable directly from this lenz less generator.

I want to give it a try and make replication but I have some misunderstanding
about this .Seems the information are not complete .For example the fig 4 are not explained.
My unclarity regarding this generator are:

1.Cannot see the difference between , interaction of magnetic field of magnets with coils in common generators with lenz force and interaction of the magnetic field in this lenzless generator. Only difference I can see is the
position of the magnets in reference with coils.

2.The magnets are interacting with coils with both N and S poles or just with upper part of them (with one pole facing the coils) and the other pole being
bellow of the core?

3.The magnets must interact between them via steel shaft(?) or this is no necessary ?

4.Can be used rectangular magnets (SSG Type) and staked them to have the surface necessary to interact with coils?

If somebody have a better understanding of this invention by reading the patent, please post here ,to help me ,(us) to understand in deeply this type of generator ,and start to make some experiments.

Mike


I hope this tread are not died

[Airstriker]

would be easier if you corrected the links to the patent or at least give the patent number ;]