Joule Thief

[NickZ]

  Gary:
  I don't know about OU. For me it's about experimenting to find the positive efficiency and economy of these circuits.
  Its look like these devices work very similar to others that utilize pulse circuits, coils, and capacitors,  to reap the radiant spike voltages.  But most other pulse circuits devices, have not been shown to work.  So this brings the idea that the Jtc can be updraded into more advanced and usefull versions, that Do Work, and that utilize the pulse circuit techology, that make them so economical to use.. almost free,  close enough?
   But we have not seen it out on the market yet, other than solar garden lights, etz.   I think that it will be coming out in many different forms, once further developed. 
 

[WilbyInebriated]

   I feel that most of what you are mentioning is true, BUT- if the Jtc provides no extra energy, and only add loses to a circuit, such as with component heat,  dimmer Leds intensity etz.  How would you explain the fact that an strong Jtc can light several hundred Leds with 1 volt for as long as it does? 
  100(s) leds bulbs times 3v, 20 mA=?   
More whan one AA 1.5v, 700 mA contains.

you didn't post your math for this so it's a little difficult to show you where you error is, but i'm willing to bet you didn't take duty cycle into account when calculating.

  Science currently has not provided an adequate  explanation (as far as I'm concerned) for the efficiency of the above working device. So, how would you suppose that the example above is possible... and much more,  as we are now finding out?
                      NickZ

do the math again and take into account the duty cycle. i bet science will then provide you with an adequate explanation.

The Observer

I do not agree.

If I can make a  JT based circuit that powers itself and  drives a load of some kind.............. it is OU
I do not have to define where the energy comes from in order to make it  OU .........

gary

i have a circuit that does not plug into the wall, uses no battery, no supercap, no solar cell, that lights an led. does that qualify as OU?

[The Observer]

Res,

You don't have to define where the energy is coming from.
Cavemen didn't know where the energy from burning a stick came from.

              The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 states all NOVEL SOURCES of ENERGY are 'illegal' for you and me.

                                        Over-Unity  = Novel Source of Energy = Unrecognized Energy Source

My thing is No-One wants to talk about the Unpaired Free Electron Spin present in Ferromagnetics. (cept me)
      This produces a FREE MAGNETIC FIELD !
      It a can Amplify the Field of a Coil 1,000,000 times without any extra energy put into the coil.
       
       The Ferromagnetic Core is the reason an impressive Joule Thief does what it does !
       No Ferro.. no Joule Thief.

My Second thing is Resonance...
        X tuning forks ring louder and longer than just one when X>1.
        An Acoustic Guitar is 1,000 times louder than an Electric Guitar.

        It is clear that when you play with an object's resonant frequency... you tap into some kind of energy.
               
So Res... How many High Voltage Ignition Coils do you think you could Resonate from a Single Joule Thief?

Best Regards,
                     The Observer


     

[NickZ]

  Guys:
   It may be entirely possible that there can be  more juice coming out of a well tuned Jtc than is going into it.
  This is an unconventional, unkwown and mostly unused technology that is still in its infancy, that is not worked out yet to its best end results.
   There are many guys doing the math right now, and in time the proof will be demonstrated. One way or another.  I can't even get my analog volt meter to move on my devices, yet the leds lights are on, and the Jts are charging batteries.  I can't prove it though.
  Most Jtc are not tuned optimally, to produce more power than they consume, that is the trick, but that does not mean that its not possible. IF a self running Jtc is possible, we will soon find out, and so will all the guys that are working hard at it.
  In anycase the idea is to develope what we don't have, and can't buy, yet,  -a useful working self running device.
  There is no such thing as OverUnity.  So, why keep repeating it, since it's a misnomer. 
  But, if "Tapping into the Source", is all a bunch of BS, then Tesla was all wrong, and we are all way off course.  And the world is still flat. No wonder we can't get off of this planet.
                                NZ

[resonanceman]

Res,

You don't have to define where the energy is coming from.
Cavemen didn't know where the energy from burning a stick came from.

              The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 states all NOVEL SOURCES of ENERGY are 'illegal' for you and me.

                                        Over-Unity  = Novel Source of Energy = Unrecognized Energy Source

My thing is No-One wants to talk about the Unpaired Free Electron Spin present in Ferromagnetics. (cept me)
      This produces a FREE MAGNETIC FIELD !
      It a can Amplify the Field of a Coil 1,000,000 times without any extra energy put into the coil.
       
       The Ferromagnetic Core is the reason an impressive Joule Thief does what it does !
       No Ferro.. no Joule Thief.

My Second thing is Resonance...
        X tuning forks ring louder and longer than just one when X>1.
        An Acoustic Guitar is 1,000 times louder than an Electric Guitar.

        It is clear that when you play with an object's resonant frequency... you tap into some kind of energy.
               
So Res... How many High Voltage Ignition Coils do you think you could Resonate from a Single Joule Thief?

Best Regards,
                     The Observer


     

The Observer

If the secrecy  act  you mention does exist  it is just anoither layer of protection  bought and paid for by the people that control " conventional power.
It is just another sign of how  corrupt  things have gotten.

About your ferromagnetics

Are you aware that you tend to do is very close to just plain arguing?

If you think  ferromagnetics has potential  .....start a thread , do some experments  .......show some results...........I am betting that then you would  have people to talk to about it.

As long as  your message is basically "hey stupid  you should be studying this not that" ........you arn't  going  to get alot of response

gary