RESONANCE EFFECTS FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[najman100]

Hello Luc
So coil some new coil and do the experiment on your existing idea of 9 v if you see charging or voltage rise in the battery as mentioned by Grounloop then you have something .

Najman

[Groundloop]

@gotoluc,

I think that my test idea will conclusive show a over unity or not. You have only one measurement
to take and that is the voltage over  the battery. If the voltage climbs (over time) then there is o/u.
Simple as that. I also think that that it will be easy to loop back the coils because you have already
demonstrated that the secondary power out coils can take a low restive load. So by proper design
I mean that the coils must be designed for exactly that. If you want to make many coils that are
like each other then just use a cardboard tube cut to equal length. Then you wind the same number
of turns on each  cardboard tube segment. Glue the wire with super glue. That way you get several
coils that are the same. Over the secondary of each coil you connect a variable capacitor in parallel.
The variable capacitor will allow you to tune each coil (LC) pair to the same resonance. In my
drawing I only used two coils. But you will probably need many more than that. You just series two
and two coils to get the needed voltage (must be higher than the battery voltage) and then parallel
enough coils to get the needed current. (Must be higher than the total loss in the circuit.) My estimate
is that you will need approx. 8 coils on the output.

Groundloop.

[Harvey]

This seems similar to a resonator circuit I designed and analyzed some time ago. It was designed to operate off normal house current at 120V, 60Hz.
http://urad.net/forums/Resonator_files/Resonator_frames.htm

With the Help of Richard Ozenbaugh Sr. (aka Oz) we were able to validate it mathematically:

http://urad.net/forums/Resonator%20With%20Ozenbaugh%20Formulas.htm

In a simulator this appears as an infinite Q runaway tank because of the lack of resistance in the calculations and produces a 500kV cyclic output. However, when calculating the lead resistances and inherent resistance of the components a more realistic output of 4kV is possible.

Please note that the schematic does not show the 60Hz frequency or a Line Fuse. A fuse will add more resistance and lower the resonant action but without it, the input current can escalate into hundreds of amps quickly when the circuit is well tuned. EXERCISE CAUTION as things can get very hot very fast. It is best to use a current limiting power source when experimenting with this circuit.


Cheers,

[TinselKoala]

Yep, what Harvey said.

I would just like to remind all that Power is not the appropriate measure for this kind of possible overunity device. Energy is the "conserved" quantity, not power. For example, my CO2 pulsed laser system draws 750 watts of power from the mains, and when it discharges the cap pulse can reach several tens of kilowatts. Overunity? Of course not. Because I haven't taken the TIME, that is the duty cycle, into consideration.

I would also like to remind all that my replication isn't really a replication--yet-- because I don't have the tuned coil pairs that gotoluc is using. Nevertheless, so far, it supports the general contention that this kind of magnifying power system can power lots of loads, without apparent additional drain on the input.

I've worked on this kind of system for many years. I have a small, more traditional Tesla power system that I built, that will light up as many compact fluorescent tubes that you can pack near it, while still drawing much less than 35 watts of power from the mains. (EDIT to add that this coil pair is carefully tuned. The frequency is about 1.25 MHz.)

Presumably if the energy could be captured and fed back to the power supply like Groundloop suggests--well, then....

[sparks]

  @Tinsel

    You got something they don't got.   Your capacitor looks quite different than a two terminal electrolytic.