Knitel's InfinityPump

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Here is the next segment of my paper on hydrostatics and hydraulics. This segment addresses the siphon effect and what you can and cannot do with it. From here on in I will cover buoyancy, the different non working PM designs and hopefully hydraulics proper, if there is enough interest.

Contrary to what some of you believe, I am not here to discourage anyone or sabotage the free energy movement. I simply attempt to teach the scientific foundations that are necessary to understand such systems to give you guys a chance to design something worthwhile instead of chasing down dead alleys.

What I am talking about is not some esoteric physics theory. My paper only deals with verifiable facts that have stood the test of time (say 3500 years!)

Again, I have simply attached the latest segment to the balance of the paper so everything stays neatly together. Suggestions and questions are welcome. You can send your queries to hans@keelytech.com if you don't want to post it.

Hans von Lieven

[wizkycho]

G'day all,

Here is the next segment of my paper on hydrostatics and hydraulics. This segment addresses the siphon effect and what you can and cannot do with it. From here on in I will cover buoyancy, the different non working PM designs and hopefully hydraulics proper, if there is enough interest.

Contrary to what some of you believe, I am not here to discourage anyone or sabotage the free energy movement. I simply attempt to teach the scientific foundations that are necessary to understand such systems to give you guys a chance to design something worthwhile instead of chasing down dead alleys.

What I am talking about is not some esoteric physics theory. My paper only deals with verifiable facts that have stood the test of time (say 3500 years!)

Again, I have simply attached the latest segment to the balance of the paper so everything stays neatly together. Suggestions and questions are welcome. You can send your queries to hans@keelytech.com if you don't want to post it.

Hans von Lieven

This is mostly waste of time in this topic: - cause You are not adding what could make InfinityPump overcome pressure at paradox point
                                                            - You have disassebled original setup to parts that can not work by themselves as such.
                                                            - many things that are not working or not working good enough can be twiked to work and work better (this is what to concentrate on).
                                                            - Nobody knows or ever heard of Knitel's InfinityPump, so nobody will know of hidrostatic facts.

So open Your own topic and call it facts about hydrostatics. talk to harti so You put this nonworkable manual where would be available all the time.
Again we need workable overcome of paradox pressure point in Knitel's InfinityPump. Can you help ? but not using radioactive or price unpredictable dirty fossil fuels ??
I have some serious investors (finally) so please do not scare them.

Wiz

[Tink]

Wizkycho,

Hans is only trying to help, please be kind to him.

[hansvonlieven]

@ wizkycho,

You must be really thick.

If you have read and understood what I wrote so far you must by now have seen, assuming even a modicum of intelligence, that Knitel's infinity pump is an abortion designed by an idiot who is ignoring the simplest facts of nature. Such a system cannot be made to work!

Your so called investors better be careful because with this project they are bound to lose their money.

Maybe this is the reason you are so belligerent, you can see your little rip-off falling apart.

Hans von Lieven

[spinner]

Thanks, Hans, for your good work.. (I admire your persistence at teaching the ungrateful, too!)

Too bad that at least a few people didn't got a message...

OK, they could get the same knowledge out of their basic physics books, or by "Googling" the stuff... Why didn't they?
....
AH, because they don't trust the "Orthodox.., bookwise..,  corrupt,.. mislead..." knowledge... Ok... Possibly....


...
@Wyzkicho , don't behave like that.... "Your" concept (the gravity exposed vertically oriented water cylinder with a combined piston/air buoyancy and a few controlling valves and some stuff) is a very very old (but still unworkable) idea...

Nothing wrong with discussing such stuff (it's very educative....). But it seems you were exaggerating with the "workability" factor... Or, with the "infinity working" claim...  It was never beyond a paper idea, was it?

I mean, on paper, many things seems logical. But in reality...?
It's actually very easy (to prove your OU concept). Simply, build the self sustaining device based upon your concept....


Hydrostatical paradox, ... siphoning "trick", ... buoyancy,... What's next, I wander? 

Do you think, maybe, that there were no people who were dealing with similar concepts in the past
...

"If OU would be that easy, it would be invented many centuries ago"...


Anyway, just keep on with the tinkering!

Cheers!



Btw, as I'm not a "pneumatics maintenance guy", I'd like to ask you a question about your "magnetic transistor" principle (the hot topic of yours before you discovered more simple truths about OU...)....

It could be closer to my understanding than all of this "pneumatics" stuff...  I think...