Anti-gravity Motor! (Everyone please read, very important)

[cameron sydenham]

what does linearity mean?
the motor we have built does have a linear input to output. 10 % in, 10% out.
and you are right, once you ad in the benefit of the angular momentum, ......
Again, I just need someone to help me get in front of the right group to see this to completion.
Cameron

[gravityblock]

This is similar to the method NASA uses to sling shot the space shuttle off a planet in order to gain speed and momentum without additional fuel.

This motor does the same thing except it uses some of it's speed and momentum that it gained from the angular momentum to put back into the axial momentum, thus having a linear (additive) affect.  The linearity of this motor has a limit.  This limit is reached when both the angular momentum and axial momentum both have the same amount of force that is in opposition to each other, thus not able to overcome each other.  It appears your motor has a linearity of 10, which is good.  The force (torque) in this system should be high.  This is my analysis at the moment.

[cameron sydenham]

i used 10 % in the above post, but & can demonstrate slighlty higher than a 1 to 1 i/o ratio . and what is unique, because of the design of the motor using Cf, the ratio gets better the faster it runs!

[gravityblock]

i used 10 % in the above post, but & can demonstrate slighlty higher than a 1 to 1 i/o ratio . and what is unique, because of the design of the motor using Cf, the ratio gets better the faster it runs!

Thanks for correcting me on your motor having a linearity of 10. You were referring to the ratio between input/output and I was referring to something different.  Since you say the ratio gets better the faster it runs,  would then refer to what I'm talking about being linear.  Very interesting.

[gravityblock]

We may not know what gravity is 100%,  but we don't know what the aether is 100% either.  Does this mean we abandon the idea of trying to control it, bypassing it, tapping into it, or using it in our favor.  If this is the case, then we should abandon all the ideas on OU or anything else.  I won't accept this, this leads to only failure.

I would like the community involved.  I have these questions for anyone who is interested.  Could an unidirectional force lead to anti-gravity or OU?  Are there other ways to have an unidirectional force other than gimbals or gyroscopes?  Could the spin, angular momentum, vortexes, and multi-directional forces have an affect in counter-acting gravity or providing OU?

We live in a 3D world.  The common motors of today are only operating in one direction, operating in one dimension only.  Gravity is acting on the entire object and not just on a single dimension of the object.  In order to overcome gravity, we must overcome it on all dimensions, or at least on two dimensions for OU.  There's another thread here about counter rotating magnets for anti-gravity.  I see a lot of research heading in this direction.

Please post your thoughts on this or other ideas you may have for anti-gravity or OU.

Failure is not an option.