Stanley Meyer Explained

[Jimboot]

LUMINOUS ??

https://www.amazon.com/Loudwolf-Titanium-Dioxide-Powder-Ounces/dp/B00I581UEE   ??A Breath of fresh air !!
plenty to experiment with here [and many "will" be  [myself included
thxChet K
PSanother open source experimenter who plays with "Oxides" and may have some thoughts
Fausto here '[member Plengo
https://overunity.com/15035/crystal-cell-research-for-experimenter/msg540088/#new

I'm using cat litter and drain cleaner for SiO2 white oxide for concreters is my source of ti02. It will be interesting to test some metal oxides with SiO2 for some other projects https://youtu.be/Ip-jDuM25FE

[h20power]

To date, no one has presented a convinsing replication of the WFC. I don't want to repeat any names as not to offend.
My current search is for a method to apply an SiO2 layer to the tube. Even if I knew, how thick would the layer be?
Meyer stated in his patent the gap in his test cells were 0.625 inch. That is 1.68 mm. I know of commercial 1 mm thick sintered glass filter tubes.
Alternatively,

There is a solution that is called "water glass" which is applied to surfaces for sealing but we want a porous finish
then, I though I can mix some TiO2 with "water glass" before applying it and guess what,
TiO2 under certain condition becomes luminous!
My work will be totally open source. I don't want any money or fame. The only reason I am here is to bounce my ideas around.
Thank you

Okay the thread is now yours so feel free to lead everyone away from the science I posted as I will sleep well at knight knowing I did what I promised so many years ago when I finally got at the science behind the patents.


Take care everyone,

[Jimboot]

A patent from ford on how to make SiO2 paint which after firing becomes a porous ceramic. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5702520A/en I have seen glimpses of luminosity while firing but not enough to test accurately

[Jimboot]

Okay the thread is now yours so feel free to lead everyone away from the science I posted as I will sleep well at knight knowing I did what I promised so many years ago when I finally got at the science behind the patents.


Take care everyone,

Aren't both ideas valid. I think we should be pursuing both

[h20power]

Aren't both ideas valid. I think we should be pursuing both

NOPE


It's clear to me that you have no idea how this technology actually works and more to the point no understanding of the science I posted for all to have for free. With this technology the dielectric needs to be in direct contact with the capacitor, but who am I, right? I know who started this oxide layer crap and it's none other than Aaron Murakami the guy who thinks this technology produces Ammonia fuel on demand.


Ask and then answer, "How can one hook up capacitors in series if their is a protective layer covering the electrodes preventing them from making use of water as a resistor?" Basically blocking the flow of electrons which in layman's terms breaks the electrical connection they all share together no direct connection to water no electrical link between the capacitors as you can't hook up these types of capacitors in series if the dielectric is air. Meyer even tells us that much stating water is part of the voltage intensifier circuit thus if you isolate the water from the circuit you no longer have a circuit pathway.
Now since what is being done is mimicking a thunderstorm correct me if I am wrong but there doesn't seem to be an oxide layer someplace in the clouds unless I really missed something when I studied them. Did I miss something?


But again who am I, right?
Well, I just so happen to just be the guy whom figured it all out is who I am. For some reason this makes a lot of people upset at me and/or they just can't grasp the idea that one man can figure something out if they just ask and answer the right questions.