Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

I understood. Thank you.   
Be that as it may, I have not yet managed to have more gas output than by  Michael Faraday.
In WFC was always a analog ammeter in the circuit. For control of the constant current component.
How many coulombs of electricity were passed through the cell, so much gas was obtained.
And it was never possible to get more than a few tens of volts per cell.
Although I know, in radio engineering, even copper can be the perfect insulator.
This is when, for example, in long lines there are quarter-wave short-circuiting bridges ...
I don't know how to say it exactly in English, but I hope you will understand me.
But with these cell sizes, frequncy it should be many gigahertz ...

Again with this technology reaching the threshold for ionization of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms is no different than reaching the boiling point for water. Meyer states that each resonant cavity will require 1 kv. Now for comparison lets treat that 1 kv like 100° C for the boiling point of water. If you only bring the temps up to 96° C will the water ever boil at 1STP? The answer is no. So, if like me you managed to put 960 volts to the resonant cavity will it work? Again the answer is no, why? Because the threshold for the ionization of the oxygen and hydrogen atoms hasn't been reached.


One thing you also need to understand is Dr. Faraday's work doesn't apply here as this method of water decomposition is following how mother nature breaks the bonds of the water molecules and not man's way to do it. A new measuring method needs to be made for the efficiency of the reaction as mankind has truly never done this before. Remember this is new to the scientific community and it hasn't been taken seriously yet.


As for the frequencies this technology operates at it's around 5-12 kHz depending on the size of the resonant cavities and the inductance of the inductors used. This is still a RLC circuit but one made to mimic mother natures way of breaking the bonds of the water molecules. There are two different resonances taking place as the gating frequency is aimed at the outer tube's vibrational resonant frequency, and the RLC circuit, well you should already know that one. This is why at first when you don't understand things you must build it as close as you can to what Meyer had done. Now if you don't wish to be honest with yourself and run around faking as if you understand this technology and you really don't you will end up blowing through a lot of money and come out the other side empty handed. It took me a very long time to gain the understanding I now have about this technology. Lots of experiments performed making use of the scientific method both asking and answering questions as I learned how this technology works the old fashion way by trial and error.


All in all I'd say you have a long ways to go to get to my level of understanding about this technology but keep your nose to the grindstone of science and everything will work out as long as you make use of the scientific method.


Take care,
Edward

[h20power]

Hi Jerry,


Yeah, it has been a while since we last wrote to one another. In my latest research I figured out something very interesting about the WFC's, but also unsettling. It turns out I, along with Meyer and anyone who copied him, made the things wrong. If you take a close look at the one where Meyer used the Alternator you will see Meyer doing it correctly in that he is physically holding the outer tubes at their "Nodes." For reasons unknown when he made the WFC for the car he no longer went to hold the tubes at their nodes.


The fundamental frequency is what the gating frequency is tuned for with the outer tubes. This is why they all must be as close to perfect as possible in their size for they all must have the same resonant frequency for this to work on them all at the same time. Luckily for me I held the resonant cavities to a really high tolerance of just ±0.0005 inches, but I didn't make the cell to correctly hold them at their nodes. When I get in some new equipment in I will make a new one that does address this problem as I am cutting out the expensive middle men that have taken so much of my money as to leave me broke most of the time. Yep, going to be doing a lot more things "In-House" from now on.


Now I did share this information on Chris's site before he banned me for pointing out racism and then the site just suddenly went down for reasons unknown, so I guess I can post that information here for all of you.


The waveform is very important as the negative and positive voltages must be nearly the same to get the amp restriction Meyer talks about. Most people on the forums dogged me out for saying that but I showed my cell wasn't heating up over time in use just as the eye witnesses talked about in the Arthur C. Clarke video. But it's like boiling water as if all one can reach is 96° C the water will never boil. With respects to Meyer one must build the resonant cavities to his dimensions for his words to work for them. If the gap between the cells is larger it will require a lot more voltage to reach the ionization threshold for the atoms that make up the water molecules to get them to eject their electrons. With water dissociated in this manor it produces, hydrogen and oxygen gases and electricity as those ejected electrons go into the water bath. Now the voltage intensifier circuit does take care of this so that it doesn't arc inside of the cell creating an explosion as when the switch is "On" creating a short circuit the electrons are free to move through the coils of the transformer on their way to the other side of the plates of the capacitor as when the switch is "On" it short circuits the capacitor.


This technology is very complex as I haven't even shared the really difficult stuff as I feel no one would truly understand it and I don't want to feed those that aim to put my company out of business.


In my testing with other cells that were unbalanced I'd be able to get some of the resonant cavities working at random and it looks like the water is boil as I would get a very large burst of gases being produced in one or two resonant cavities but never all of them at the same time as I didn't make the cell correctly. I have a video of it but I don't think it's the right time to share such things on the net as of yet. With Meyer's technology the voltage intensifier circuit is a must or it will not be duplicating how mother natures goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. Now there are more ways to do this but most of those ways are very dangerous as it can be done with radiation, strong magnetic fields, and any other way that we know of to get the atoms to eject or have their electrons removed. I see the thread started with someone trying to go over making use of magnetic fields to do this and wonder if they now that this was a problem for those folks that build these atoms smashers. They use water as a dielectric liquid in their systems and from the things I read this was a really big problem for them that they had to design out for as I stated when water is broken down this way it not only produces these gases but also electricity. In time it will produce enough electric charge as to create a spark which would blow up their high dollar equipment. It is also how those three reactors in Japan blew their tops as by way of radiation bombardment those high radiation levels knocked the electrons off of the atoms and over time the electrons built up a charge that was strong enough to over come the air's resistance and that's when they blew their tops putting radiation all over the planet.


I learned all of this by first moving away from studding the WFC when I went to figure out how the Gas Processor worked. The Gas Processor targets one atom and the WFC targets two atoms simultaneously is the primary difference between the two devices. In order to understand all of this I had to leave Meyer's work for awhile just moving wherever the science took me in my experiments and come back to it once I understood what was going on. I think this is why when I speak of this technology most people think I am coming out of left field as Meyer never spoke about many of the things I figured out about this technology. https://adobefreeuserschannel.na3.documents.adobe.com/public/fs?aid=CBFCIBAA3AAABLblqZhBHwnu0ZoIma-oV4QM4v1jOGi46qx-tIaYtZpYhOzFPQSVahcL3H7Rv0oPteGmUhck%2A


As for those that solved making hydrogen and oxygen with just sunlight with their artificial leaf I am not sure what happened to them as they had all the funding they needed to have been in mass production by now but they just seemed to have disappeared. The earth is going into "Hell Mode" as we keep on using fossil fuels and they are nowhere to be found with their solution, strange?


Best Regards to you too,
Edward

[h20power]

Hello Everyone,


Now here is something a lot of people simply don't understand about this technology. When you look at the voltage intensifier circuit many people assume that they can take this technology to any frequency they so desire, yes kolbacict[/size][/color]? Here's the problem with that. Which of the parts of the VIC will limit how fast one can pulse it, in other words what is the limiting part of the setup? It's the switch, IE, blocking diode. What happens if you choose a switch that is too slow and thus can't keep up with the frequencies you need to be running this technology at? Well, watch this video to learn just what will happen if you choose a switch that is too slow or if you chose a frequency that will over clock your switch: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXEyCf1P0UU[/size] As you can see the switch is the limiting part of this technology and if you overclock it bad things will happen. So, you don't want to run this technology in the Giga Hertz range do you? For if you do so chances are high that you will overclock the switch as it will not be able to keep up as a result.


Now failure to use the switch, IE, you thought it was just a waste of time and you feel you can make changes to a technology you don't fully understand will result in a capacitor that is switching polarity and heating up the water bath by way of molecular friction as the water molecules keep switching back and forth trying to follow the ever switching polarity of the frequency you are using on the capacitor. Got that Jerry?


This is why I urge folks that don't fully understand this technology to simply copy as best you can what Stanley Meyer did and observe this technology both asking and answering questions so that you can gain an understand of this technology. This part will not be easy as there are many false teachings about what Stanley Meyer did as the people observing the technology with their own two hands simply made a few mistakes. But none the less it is a hill you will have to overcome in order to get this technology up and running correctly.


Remember when you mocked me Jerry when I told everyone over at Ionizationx that I came up with a new theory for the books of science? Now you can see just how important that theory I came up with is towards understanding this technology and being able to predict other things in nature and things that are man made that are breaking the bonds of the water molecules in this fashion. With that theory we now know what to look for.
Here is a example of this theory answering things that science finds are unknown. Now this example is of a horrific plane crash and I truly feel sorry for the loss of life. Remember flight TWA 800 that went down shortly after takeoff? It's the one where they drudged the entire plane out of the ocean looking for explosives but never found and evidence of any explosive materials. Well, it turns out that plane took off in a severe thunderstorm and the pilot, along with most of the scientific community, didn't know that thunderstorms will produce large amounts of hydrogen and oxygen gases when the conditions are right for them to do so. These gases are produced at the bottom of the cloud and rise to the top of the cloud and generally is ignited producing the earth shaking thunder we hear and feel on the ground. The plane intercepted a large pocket of hydrogen and oxygen gas headed for the top of the cloud and it's engines ignited the mixture which blew the plane to kingdom come. This is what this theory I came up with allowed me to figure out about how that plane was blown out of the sky when the mainstream scientist just ended up throwing up their hands telling everyone they couldn't figure out what happened.


It's a sad story as I believe all hands were lost but it goes to show the importance of the theory I came up with as it answers some unknowns we have. In other things scientist are just figuring out about thunderstorms is they are responsible for some of the earthquakes we have as those very large explosions taking place overhead shake the ground which will in turn cause the ground to relive built up tension in the fault lines and perhaps even the tectonic plates. Now I watched a documentary about earthquakes and the scientist are now seeing a pattern where these thunderstorms are actually causing earthquakes. Sorry I can't find the video for you but it just goes to show we humans are learning more and more about our earth and how it behaves all the time.


As always I hope this helps everyone's understanding of this technology just a bit more.
Take care,
Edward

[kolbacict]

didn't know that thunderstorms will produce large amounts of hydrogen and oxygen gases when the conditions are right for them to do so.

It's true ?_{It's true ?}

[kolbacict]

As for the frequencies this technology operates at it's around 5-12 kHz depending on the size of the resonant cavities and the inductance of the inductors used.

I don't understand anyway.
The distance between the electrodes in the cell is millimeters.
The wavelength at 12 kHz is 25 kilometers. 300000000/f.