Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Dissociation of the Water Molecule

Started by Farrah Day, March 17, 2009, 10:22:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 31
User actions

WilbyInebriated

#60
May 12, 2009, 08:12:54 PM
Quote from: newbie123 on May 12, 2009, 08:00:46 PM
Over Faraday gas measurements are just calculation errors (Every one I've seen, at least) ..    I've actually looked into this... And the series cells, i.e. Bob Boyce 101, will appear to get more gas out per current, when they're really not (it's sort of an illusion)...  But I don't want to get into the details in this thread.
will you get into the details in a new thread? i can start one for you if you don't know how. i would love to hear these details, i would like to see your math on the calculation errors too.  ;)
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

newbie123

#61
May 12, 2009, 08:18:22 PM
Quote from: WilbyInebriated on May 12, 2009, 08:12:54 PM
will you get into the details in a new thread? i can start one for you if you don't know how. i would love to hear these details, i would like to see your math on the calculation errors too.  ;)
Sounds good.  Give me some over Faraday examples, measured on series cells.
Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

WilbyInebriated

#62
May 12, 2009, 08:24:24 PM
Quote from: newbie123 on May 12, 2009, 08:18:22 PM
     Sounds good.  Give me some over Faraday examples, measured on series cells.

no no, pay attention now...
YOU SAID "Over Faraday gas measurements are just calculation errors (Every one I've seen, at least) .. "
you've seen them... you infer you did the math to come to the conclusion they are errors... this was ONE POST AGO, DON'T PLAY STUPID LIKE I AM SUPPOSED TO SUPPLY YOU WITH THEM.

YOU THEN SAID "Bob Boyce 101, will appear to get more gas out per current, when they're really not (it's sort of an illusion)...  But I don't want to get into the details in this thread."

those are the details i am talking about...

There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

newbie123

#63
May 12, 2009, 08:43:09 PM
Quote from: WilbyInebriated on May 12, 2009, 08:24:24 PM
no no, pay attention now...
YOU SAID "Over Faraday gas measurements are just calculation errors (Every one I've seen, at least) .. "
you've seen them... you infer you did the math to come to the conclusion they are errors... this was ONE POST AGO, DON'T PLAY STUPID LIKE I AM SUPPOSED TO SUPPLY YOU WITH THEM.

YOU THEN SAID "Bob Boyce 101, will appear to get more gas out per current, when they're really not (it's sort of an illusion)...  But I don't want to get into the details in this thread."
those are the details i am talking about...

Being rude won't get us anywhere...

I haven't seen any efficiency measurements in a while, so I was hoping you could supply a link... 

But, in a nutshell it comes down to:

1.) People overlook the temperature of their cells while  calculating energy efficiency (important factor) ... Among other things,  heat creates steam, which can give the appearance of hydroxy gas production .     And..

2.) People don't understand that Faraday efficiency is "current efficiency" and nothing to do with voltage.  And BB cells give the appearance of only 5 amps doing work when it's actually more (each cell chops the voltage down, but still has the amps).

PM me or start a new thread  if you want to know more,  or prove me wrong.. . Maybe I have a misunderstanding.


Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

WilbyInebriated

#64
May 12, 2009, 08:58:22 PM
Quote from: newbie123 on May 12, 2009, 08:43:09 PM
 

Being rude won't get you anywhere...

I haven't seen any efficiency measurements in a while, so I was hoping you could supply a link... 

But, in a nutshell it comes down to:

1.) People overlook the temperature of their cells while  calculating energy efficiency (important factor) ... Among other things, steam can give the appearance of hydroxy gas production .     And..

2.) People don't understand that Faraday efficiency is "current efficiency" and nothing to do with voltage.  And BB cells give the appearance of only 5 amps doing work when it's actually more (each cell chops the voltage down).

PM me or start a new thread  if you want to know more,  or prove me wrong.. . Maybe I have a misunderstanding.

asking you for your data twice isn't being rude. you're the one who is still avoiding the 2 simple questions posed to you. which could be considered to be rude...
re: "haven't seen any efficiency measurements in awhile"
you didn't keep your math?  ::)

in a nutshell it comes down to:
1) do you, or do you not, have your math that shows the over faraday measurements that you claimed to have seen were, in actuality, erroneous?
2) do you, or do you not have details about the efficiency of the boyce101 to add to this thread http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7453.msg177980#msg177980 i created for you to "get into the details"?

i really don't think you have either, but there's your thread to prove me wrong.
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 31
User actions