The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[allcanadian]

I think it operates exactly like the Magnetic Power Patent. You have to read this, I had been working on this exact process before I saw the patent and must admit they have it nailed.
So here it is, what if you had a split magnetic path? The primary field moves from top to bottom with two paths through a magnetic material, the output coils are oriented so this primary field can move through either or both of them.The input or control field moves through the magnetic material horizontally, to the left-to the right, but since the control field is at right angles to the output coils and the primary field it cannot be affected by them. It is absolutely a one way process and this is literally the magic of this technology.
The harnessing of any primary conservative field with no reversal of power, isolating the input from the output.
So what if SM used a toroid with a magnetic field moving through it and he could turn this field with no field reversal. As the input is additive and is part of the output it is conservative, but any external field is added to the output and cannot affect the input.
Im sure this is it, the MPI patent explains this effect very well and is worth reading.

[CTG Labs]

Hi,

Would the magnetic field not stay inside the metal core and go around the holes where the wire goes through and thus not create any EMF?  But I guess that is the control coil isnt it, not the collector?  Will you not just move the magnets field, with proportion to the current in the control coil?  Where does any extra come from?


Regards,

D.

[allcanadian]

@CTG Labs
If you look at the patent there is a picture showing a cross section of the generator, when the control input is ON the primary field is pushed to the left we will say. You will notice that where the output coils go through the core (the hole) the field turns or wraps 3/4 way round the wire. As current is induced in the output coil this field turns 360 Deg round the hole, turning the primary field even more. Think of a tornado,you need two flows to create a turning force, Vector two fields incoming at 90 Deg, add a turning component in the hole and you have induction. To see what is really happening run this cross section on vizimag, you will like what you see.
As for OU, it should be obvious, a magnetic transistor effect. A small input turning a larger one. If the output is driven by the primary field, a PM then any work given to the output must come from the PM, which is free. The control does not drive the output, it produces a steering force on the primary. You gain when the control in on, and gain when the fields return to equlibrium.

[Grumpy]

Boosted induction with PM's - not the same as the SM TPU - not the Holy Grail of "free energy".

For those interested, Mark Goldes mentioned on another site that the patent left out a key element that makes the device OU and that this would be added via an amendment at a later date.

[starcruiser]

You never want to say in a patent that your device is OU or make free energy, then they either won't grant the patent or the Fed's grab it.