The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[hartiberlin]

@Dave,
maybe you can just drive the 2 x 12 Volts transformer with the same noise generator
and just see, if the 240 Volts output cancels all out ?
There might be still some output, when you use noise as the source and drive the core
with it into saturation,so the input should at least be 0.5 Watts or so...

Many thanks.

Here you go...

Many thanks, but what circuit diagram was used for the 3 scope shots ?
You can just describe it.
What voltage levels did you feed the transformers with ?
12 Volts peek to peek or lower ?
Many thanks Dave.

The same as my 3 transformer experiment from before, but this time I fed whitenoise instead.  So white noise is fed in to the two transformers in parallel, then I changed the phases between the two transformers output in to the 3rd transformer to get results.  In in parellel and in phase the voltages adds again, outof phase it cancels to nothing.



Dave.

Hi Dave,
I meant to do it all in ONE transformer.
I wanted to know, if you can achieve the same
as Graham Gunderson with his scalar ray beam.

Also the saturation of the core plays a role in it probably,
so it makes no sense, just to feed only MilliVolts levels.
YOu must feed it at least with a few volts of amplitude...

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[gn0stik]

Hi Dave,
I meant to do it all in ONE transformer.
I wanted to know, if you can achieve the same
as Graham Gunderson with his scalar ray beam.

Also the saturation of the core plays a role in it probably,
so it makes no sense, just to feed only MilliVolts levels.
YOu must feed it at least with a few volts of amplitude...

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Stefan,

My noise circuit only produces 0.5v max.  I will need to amplify it first!




Dave.

Or he could do it himself.

[c0mster]

Dave
I have done extensive tests using the idea of swapping from a series of caps into one cap then back into the caps in parallel. I am just waiting for my 4016 switch to show up to make it electronic rather than mechanical switching. The extra you speak of is the electrons moving into the cap. I did this: Charge 2 caps the same uf and voltage to 9 volts. Charge a third cap to the same voltage but with only say 20% of uf in the other 2. Now connect the 2 larger caps in series add a light bulb between the positive of the series caps and the positive of the smaller uf cap.  Connect the negative of the series caps to the smaller uf cap. The smaller uf cap is charged to 18 volts and the light lights. Now take that apart and connect the 2 bigger caps in parallel, connect the positive to the small cap and the negative through the bulb. The bulb lights and electrons have now been put back into the big caps. I made a manual switching device to swap the electrons back and forth, I found  loss do to resistance, but a very small amount. Now I hope to use the swapping electron to travel at an adjustable frequency, power my round ferrite core and be able to put my watt gain back into the caps when they are switched to parallel. And if it all works the caps should explode do to the voltage increasing.


C0mster

[starcruiser]

Guys,

I was doing some research and came across this article at http://users.netonecom.net/~swordman/Radio/re-loop-article.htm and found this to be of interest, we have been talking about tuning the collector coil to a particular frequency and this should be of help so I wanted to share this. excerpt:

Effective length (of loop antenna)

When we discussed active-antenna systems [in a prior article in the series, and which I don't have], we frequently mentioned the effective length of an antenna (often referred to as effective height). We can also talk about the effective vertical length of a loop antenna. An approximation for computing the effective length, LL, of loop antennas is

LL = (2*pi*n*A*Mu)/(wavelength) [Eq. 1]
Where wavelength is in meters; n = the number of turns in the loop; A = the cross-sectional area of one turn in square meters; Mu = the effective permeability of the core material ( = 1 for air core); and wavelength = (3*(10**)/(frequency in Hz). [That's wavelength = three times ten to the eighth power, then divided by frequency.]

Hope this is understandable.


Regards,

Carl

[jacob]

Now, what if you, through circuitry, placed an inductor across the two caps, with the caps in parallel. The caps would theoretically both dump at the same time into the inductor, right? So at the exact point when both caps are discharged and all the energy from the two caps is stored in the inductor's magnetic field, you would disconnect one of the caps, the second one from the example above, and you would leave only the first cap connected to this now fully loaded inductor.

Well, it seems to me that nothing at all would happen. If both caps have a similar charge, no current will flow through the inductor and therefore no magnetic field will develop in it.


O.K. guys, you all deserve a 60 seconds philosophical break... Here are two interesting quotes from Bruce DePalma:

Free energy comes from a place where limitation is not the paradigm of Mankind, and ownership and control are ideas which have been forgotten long ago. In the sense that free energy is available now, the contemporary establishment is confronted with something it does not want to understand, because in its understanding all other realities are shattered.

The fact that free energy is suppressed speaks to the greed and self-interest of a ruling elite which, even in the face of an emergency of global starvation, resource depletion and environmental pollution, will not give one inch if it means loss of control.

Regards,

Jacob