Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[eisenficker2000]

@Dusty, very good setup!

Try to get at least one more pair of weights (and hockeysticks) in at 90 degees . To use a part of their inequal moment to get over the dead point  (near top point of the track) of the first set.

[persume]

...and the left hand shakes the right hand.

And why -do tell- did he not reveal the secret on his death bed then?

Mankind are swine?

And yes if I find something like this I will shove it down your throaths free of charge and happy to do it. As my "getting on" with it:

How much are YOU going to pay me?

Pathetic closed source thinking.

I guess you don't know that much about Bessler. He died falling from a roof of a building. I'm asking you to give up ten years of your lifes work and all money you've made. Will you do it? Live the comparison, walk in the shoes before you comment.

Left hand shaking what right hand?

The swine comment comes from the bible, but the understanding is a human one and probably a lot older than that. It means the average couch potato, you know ...the kind that want thier fast food and want it now, appreciates and respects very little. Yet they always have some kind of idealistic comment ( if they even think at all ) about society. Easy to judge.  Try putting some experience behind it, it won't make you bitter if your, well...pure souled, if you have a good intent, it will make you better. How easy to smash a glass window, how hard to create. "Swine" will never consider that before picking up a rock.

[hansvonlieven]

I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. The people who should get their heads out of their arses are the ones who think they can get away with a patent on an overunity device.

Anyone who is not willing to share an invention which will profoundly further mankind is either too dumb to realise he or she will bathe in riches regardless of patent or money for selling or not because the CREDIT will be linked to them, are too greedy or simply have nothing to show and are looking for attention.

Bessler falls into the second category.

Genius or not, Bessler was a greedy bastard and I do blame him for not disclosing his invention.

You really don't understand Bessler very well, do you?

Bessler was not motivated by greed.

Bessler was a complex man. He was a fundamentalist Christian fanatic. His religious convictions controlled everything in his life. There was one thing he was aiming for. He believed he had been chosen by God to create a technical school that would teach advanced technology to students while primarily instilling into his students the "fear of God". (This was meant literally, he actually says this).

For this he needed money. The outrageous sum he asked for his invention was to pay for just this. He believed that God had given him the plans for his wheel to make this project possible. Any amount of money insufficient to do this was not acceptable.

When things started going against him he probably saw in this a sign that the time for this revelation was not right and destroyed all evidence of his machines awaiting a new sign by God when to begin again in earnest. It never arrived, he died. I think that is mainly why he never wrote his secret down for future generations, probably believing that if God really wanted it He would find another vessel.

There is much evidence of this. Few scholars are aware of Bessler's religious writings, fewer have studied them. None of his books on Christianity, to my knowledge, have been translated.

Hans von Lieven

[oscar]

sorry, was double

[oscar]

Take a greasy cherry pit between the thumb and bent finger… yes?  It goes a long way, does it not?  This is, or must be, the final action as the slow moving weight is feed back into the high velocity circuit…

Yes, these concepts are intriguing:
- scissors cutting round rod and
- fingers squeezing cherry pit, ejecting it

And then we also should remember Netwon's law that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

The equal and opposite reaction in the cases mentioned above, would be to observe the round rod squeezing back onto the pair of scissors.
That is probably not a good way to put it, but nevertheless the scissors do change shape and (relative) position  due to the collision with the rounded object, no?

What if not cherry stones or dumbbells are used as a weights but scissor shaped objects?
A crazy thought?

Please consider: a scissors looks like an X.
And scissors (or call them Xes or call them 'two rods with a pin-joint') can shape shift from being tall/long (=small angle between the legs) to broad/short (=big angle between the legs).
They are forced to do this, when put under pressure (or when meeting a barrier).

Maybe one can imagine a chain of Xes, arranged in a circle or rather in a D-shape so that there are 9 on the descending and only 7 on the ascending side.

There might even be a missing link (in the chain).
Should this be the case, one X  - at a certain point in the cycle - might have to actually jump places, in addition to doing shape shift trickery.

edit: I envisage the Xes to be individually hanging in the wheel, when on the descending side and to be somehow stacked and resting on top of each other while pressed against the outer and inner barrier(s) on the ascending side.