Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[LarryC]

How come? You're denying then that science has achievements which pinpoint which is possible and which isn't. The working model is only the engineering part. It comes after the scientific proof.

What? I'm really glad and billions of others that the Wright brothers didn't follow the so called scientific opinions of their times.

Regards, Larry

[Omnibus]

No definite proof has been shown... only mistakes in math.

Ron

These are unsupported statements and you should restrain from filling the forum with such.

[Omnibus]

What? I'm really glad and billions of others that the Wright brothers didn't follow the so called scientific opinions of their times.

Regards, Larry

Enough with these Wright brothers. Their's was not science but technology. Also, it's inapplicable in the current case. Wright brothers argument is the resort of the weak and insecure.

[stgpcm]

These are unsupported statements and you should restrain from filling the forum with such.

"we have definitive proof" is indeed an unsupported statement, and it would be better if the forum was not filled with such.

At best we have a proof no-one has discovered a problem with, although I would say that assertion was tenuous given errors are being discovered in the vector calculations

[Omnibus]

"we have definitive proof" is indeed an unsupported statement, and it would be better if the forum was not filled with such.

At best we have a proof no-one has discovered a problem with, although I would say that assertion was tenuous given errors are being discovered in the vector calculations

What I said applies to you as well. Don't return to me what I said. It doesn't apply to me. I've given proof. You haven't.