Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 66 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: stgpcm on May 27, 2009, 02:26:06 AM
Omnibus, You claim my calculation is wrong, because you assert the force developed on the system can't exceed the force due to gravity. I admit, that does seem to be "common sense". That doesn't stop the assertion being false

Using your principle the primitive machine "wedge" doesn't work.

We can no longer split rock with a wedge, because the force developed by the wedge sideways "can't" exceed the force put in by the operator.

Using your principle the primitive machine "screw" no longer works. We can no longer use jack to lift a car, because the force developed by the screw "can't" exceed the force put in by the operator.

By all means continue to do your calculations, they're an interesting mental exercise, but my third, 4 weight wheel, and just about every failed wheel before it "works" according to your constructions.

Your incorrect maths are not what makes Abelings wheel work.

No, this is not what I explained. Read it again, try to understand it and stop this useless exchange.

stgpcm

Quote from: Omnibus on May 27, 2009, 02:39:06 AM
No, you didn't. Arrogance is no argument.
Yes I did, I showed three entirely separate methods for calculating the torque, all of which gave the same result.

you have stated only one way, and state it is correct. YOU are the one using proof by arrogance. Please stop wasting the time of those trying to discover how Abeling's wheel works.

stgpcm

Quote from: Omnibus on May 27, 2009, 02:40:27 AM
No, this is not what I explained. Read it again, try to understand it and stop this useless exchange.

Quote from: Omnibus on May 18, 2009, 07:42:35 AM
@stgpcm,

Any force that is derived from this mass can only be of lower (smaller, lesser) magnitude than its initial one.

[...]

the torque which this mass will create can only be lower (smaller, lesser) than the torque this mass can create without a guide but for the same arm. Guides cannot create more mass than the mass than the mass initially given.



BUSTED. Here you clearly state that the force on the system can't be any more than the input force.

Wedge. Screw. Inclined plane. Lever. None of these work in Omnibus's world.


Omnibus

Quote from: stgpcm on May 27, 2009, 03:59:04 AM
BUSTED. Here you clearly state that the force on the system can't be any more than the input force.

Wedge. Screw. Inclined plane. Lever. None of these work in Omnibus's world.

The above proves you don't know the essence of this problem. Like I said, useless exchange.

Cloxxki

Quote from: Omnibus on May 27, 2009, 04:27:59 AM
The above proves you don't know the essence of this problem. Like I said, useless exchange.
You have now each spent ~50 posts quarrelling over calculations. Perhaps you could take it offline, and find a mutually respected scientist to take a stance?
You are both showing symptoms of the somebody-is-wrong-on-the-internet syndrome.

Please divert your excess energy towards creating a PMM. It could have been invented, documented and independently confirmed halfway your quarrel, let alone if you worked together.

Thank you.