Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

If someone would apply the non-scientific approach of asking to first see a working device in order to understand that a principle it is based on works then that someone should first ask the Tokamak guys to present a working Tokamak before waiting for new billions of dollars for their project to pour in.

[Omnibus]

Dsimanek site proves nothing else but the fact that he is an opportunist who doesn't quite understand scientific reasoning let alone how to make a working device. His lack of talents and understanding can serve as no proof for whether or not a principle is workable.

[MrMag]

Dsimanek site proves nothing else but the fact that he is an opportunist who doesn't quite understand scientific reasoning let alone how to make a working device. His lack of talents and understanding can serve as no proof for whether or not a principle is workable.

opportunist? You mean he is making money on his site? I didn't know that.

Scientific reasoning trumps building a unworkable device that doesn't work.

[spinn_MP]

Dsimanek site proves nothing else but the fact that he is an opportunist who doesn't quite understand scientific reasoning let alone how to make a working device. His lack of talents and understanding can serve as no proof for whether or not a principle is workable.

This is silly. Anyone who understands what is on prof. Symanek site, can also understand that you're talking nonsense.

[Omnibus]

Indeed, scientific reasoning trumps showing a device that doesn't work. When scientific reasoning proves that the principle is workable, as in the case at hand, presenting an unworkable device doesn't overthrow that scientific reasoning.

As far as making money on that you should know better.