Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 62 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 465 466 467 468 469 ... 491
User actions

Omnibus

#2330
January 25, 2011, 11:46:48 AM
Anyone who understands what's on the dsimanek site should know better not to conclude that the scientific principle at the basis of these devices is unworkable. That site is just a compilation of something an opportunist such as dsimanek fails to understand and that's only a demonstrqtion of his misunderstanding of the matter at hand.

Omnibus

#2331
January 25, 2011, 11:51:02 AM
The confusion of someone such as dsimanek should never be used as an argument in scientific reasoning.

WilbyInebriated

#2332
January 25, 2011, 11:59:45 AM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 25, 2011, 11:46:48 AM
Anyone who understands what's on the dsimanek site should know better not to conclude that the scientific principle at the basis of these devices is unworkable. That site is just a compilation of something an opportunist such as dsimanek fails to understand and that's only a demonstrqtion of his misunderstanding of the matter at hand.
you're being far too vague and general. select one device out of the collection and let's get down to brass tacks. that means pick one, then define the scientific principle that is the basis of said device and we can go from there...

and why don't you start a new thread to do it in... ::)
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

Omnibus

#2333
January 25, 2011, 12:02:46 PM
Sjack Abeling's device, for instance, is based on a workable principle. It inherently contains in its very construction a persistent violation of the lever rule at every position of the wheel.

spinn_MP

#2334
January 29, 2011, 07:17:22 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 25, 2011, 12:02:46 PM
Sjack Abeling's device, for instance, is based on a workable principle. It inherently contains in its very construction a persistent violation of the lever rule at every position of the wheel.

Working principle, my ass.
Sjack Ab's device is a joke for the kids. Naturally, you swallowed it, hook and sinker.

Now, what?
Where are your proofs, Omnibot?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 465 466 467 468 469 ... 491
User actions