MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[queue]

@queue & @wattsup

Have you ever got a single segment to start outside of the the stator, move into it and then exit without helping it along?

Fred

Check my AQ stuff .. in one the videos you will see the rotor is attracted into the stators field @ 10 oclock goes over the top of the wheel then breaks through the wall ( pull back zone )  out of the array at about 4 oclock..

Each end of this array sucks the rotor into the stator array while the opposite end wants to pull the rotor back  preventing it from leaving.

There are magnets on only one end of the rotor .. the other is just a empty copper pipe stuck o the end to balance out the other
copper pipe holding the mag rotor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjwK2WeLzWQ

Cheers
Queue

[lostcauses10x]

Again this is a game of placement of magnets. I see folks just trying to copy it without basic understanding of magnets.

The spacing between magnets needs to be done to the stator magnet. It also is such the height of the stator would in hypothesis  be a part of this.

The horse shoe magnet has two poles. Each C magnet has two poles.  The spacing has to be set to were the stator interact with the rotor at the proper time.  My advice to see if this can even work is to play with the rotor spacing to get the best acceleration to a run. Of course spacing to the stator and height of the stator would also need to be done.  Such is the spacing would have to be set to the magnets in use. Not some set distance.

Simple put if an arrangement can not be done to create enough acceleration, well that is the problem.

Folks think that by using his measurements with out knowing the strength and field of his C magnets are delusional.  Again it it a game of push pull and making sure it does not balance. 

No it should be evident that the spacing in between is also of consideration.  Since these are magnets, short of some how making the currents in the disk arrange in a homopolar motor effect, it just basic magnets, push pull.

If such is real it may even be the induced currents in the plate are aiding this. Again it would be a critical timing game if such is involved.

Again I am not saying it is real, or fake. Just looking at the possibility, and what could be going on with out all the fancy explanations. As my step dad always said, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.

[cloud camper]

LC, it doesn't matter what magnets or spacings are used.  As long as we are dealing with B fields, any configuration of any size will
find a position of symmetry and lock up.  This is why magnet motors don't work and is what Howard was trying to tell us.  His whole thrust was to kill the B fields completely, thereby unmasking or exposing the corner vortical spin fields.  The spin fields are assymmetric and nonconservative.  This is why HJ never alternated magnet polarity, always using the same poles to utilize the spin fields.  Look at the close spacing on his Stonehenge motor.  This would never work using any common gate technique.  The spin fields are very short range and create a unidirectional pull around the rotor without sticky spots, once the useless B fields are sunk out of the way.  Think of the B fields as just unwanted noise that must be filtered out.

Milows motor works because his rotor magnets are so incredibly weak, exposing the spin fields without using permeability plates.

[wattsup]

I had posted this in the wrong thread - sorry guys.

@queue

If you are seeing the same thing as me then we are on the right track, or loop.

What is puzzling is that @cloud camper posted saying HJ says symmetry does not work also. I discovered this myself and am very pleased to have read it coming from HJ. But the puzzlement is still there when you look at the picture of HJs device. Geez it looks pretty symmetric. So maybe symmetric in too close proximity does not work. His wheel has four segments with spacing in between but one would  expect much more spacing given the size of his rotors. So for sure his flexible magnet material is required to cut off the ends and permit a more compact design.

Also, you see the way he needs two hand to hold that fat sucker of a stator. I wonder how many times he banged his hands against a turning rotor. OUCH. Must hurt.

Yep I will order my rotors tonight when I get back home from the office.

@Fred Flintstone

Actually that's not a bad idea. But I would think it better to just cut one wheel in six and place them on six levels so you don't have to turn more disk mass for only 1/6th rotor segments. The only thing that haunts me about the idea is what if you go through all that trouble and the six segments still manage to make one field. Now how smart would the magnets be then. lol

Say hi to Wilma. lol

[X00013]

@ que, I wood liken 2 straitn 1 thing out, as i am buldn myself. ur mags r imperial? no? or are they metric,thanx