Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

You can't read? In case you have the comprehension of an ape, try this: His measurements are meaningless to people unless he can prove he's capable of making such complex measurements.

I'm still waiting for your answer. What's the matter, you can't answer? As expected.

Paul

don't go changing your tune now pauly, it looks suspicious. you said, and i quote,

All of the scope stuff is meaningless unless .99 can convince me he's a senior EE or has extensive experience with such measurements.

convince YOU, not people, YOU.
measurements are measurements. whether poynt is a senior EE or not has no bearing on their meaning.

i answered you if you can read. i said, and i quote, "i think i'll let you keep talking since you are so sure of yourself. "
can't answer and choosing not to are different, i don't expect you to see the difference. go ahead and assume what you wish.

[PaulLowrance]

Stefan,

These fakers are sinking your forum. Do you want to attract tinkerers, or scientists that actually have a chance at succeeding? From the start I've outlined the best method of taking the measurments, which it turns out that .99 has almost completed. These other people are childish idiots.

It's your choice. Both can't exist here. No good scientist would hang out at this forum with these kids.

Paul

[Rosemary Ainslie]

No good scientist would hang out at this forum with these people.

Paul

I get it that's why you hang out here?      A 'no good scientist'? LOL

[PaulLowrance]

I get it that's why you hang out here?   

Delusional. Scan through the thread to discover how often I post.

[WilbyInebriated]

Stefan,

These fakers are sinking your forum. Do you want to attract tinkerers, or scientists that actually have a chance at succeeding? From the start I've outlined the best method of taking the measurments, which it turns out that .99 has almost completed. These other people are childish idiots.

It's your choice. Both can't exist here. No good scientist would hang out at this forum with these kids.

Paul

from the start? where were you when this thread started? i don't recall you offering advice to tk on how to measure... and now you are calling it the best method, i thought you were calling it the correct method. are you suggesting there is more than one correct way? ie: some better than others.

so you're not a good scientist then defined by your own actions...

still waiting for you to explain how those quotes you posted of mine are ad hominem. that should be a doozy.