Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

I am just trying to minimize costs, i need pretty long cables for 2 grounds. Then thickness will be a factor.
3 core flex mains wire would be a cost efficient solution.
I don´t think that Kapanadze used coax for his ground cables (see image), you can only see one at the spark gap, which he probably used for cost reasons like Bolt said.

[Groundloop]

@aether22,

You might be right. It is a very high difference when I connect the wire.
The normal flux coupling between L1 and L2 is just barley enough to make
the bulb glow very dimly. But when I connect the wire then I get almost
full brightness in the bulb. I will not try a MOT because I will keep the
power levels low and non dangerous. If there is a OU effect in this then
it will be displayed at low power levels also.

Groundloop.

[vrand]

I am just trying to minimize costs, i need pretty long cables for 2 grounds. Then thickness will be a factor.
3 core flex mains wire would be a cost efficient solution.
I don´t think that Kapanadze used coax for his ground cables (see image), you can only see one at the spark gap, which he probably used for cost reasons like Bolt said.

That Kapanadze photo of his ground wire is perfect, as there is lots of surface area in the thin stranded wires for the "skin effect" of HF current to easily flow through the cable.   

[callanan]

@aether22,

You might be right. It is a very high difference when I connect the wire.
The normal flux coupling between L1 and L2 is just barley enough to make
the bulb glow very dimly. A I connect the wire then I get almost
full brightness in the bulb. I will not try a MOT because I will keep the
power levels low and non dangerous. If there is a OU effect in this then
it will be displayed at low power levels also.

Groundloop.

This could precisely be the assumption that has caused so many not to have come across OU from the ground for the last century. What if indeed there is a minimum threshhold level of power at a certain voltage required for the ground to give up it's OU effect. Sure, very precise tuned circuits at high voltage may be able to also achieve this threshold level but in reality, that maybe like finding a needle in a hay stack which is perhaps why very few people have claimed to have done so.

An initial brute force and untuned or perhaps roughly tuned method is perhaps what is going to allow the OU ground threshold to be reached and replicated by more people then a low power precisely tuned method. Then, when the consensous of success determines that it is all very real, the engineering to reduce the threshold power levels will occur as a natural progression.

I am not encouraging anyone to risk their safety, especially if they do not feel they have the experience to work with higher voltage and power levels in a safe manner, but I am just pointing out that it maybe be a requirement to do so for a greater chance of success and don't want to see more experienced people who are capable of working with such power levels safely, discouraged from trying.

[aether22]

@aether22,

You might be right. It is a very high difference when I connect the wire.
The normal flux coupling between L1 and L2 is just barley enough to make
the bulb glow very dimly. But when I connect the wire then I get almost
full brightness in the bulb. I will not try a MOT because I will keep the
power levels  and non dangerous. If there is a OU effect in this then
it will be displayed at low power levels also.

Groundloop.

My point is that you just need a flux source nearby, it does not really need to be part of the device as such.

I would be interested in replicating your setup probably, and details would be appreciated, just and length of main coil, wire gauge but mainly details on the oscillator.

This simple experiment MIGHT be even more important than Kapagen, of course there is much to test first.