Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

The ground cable is stranded wire (i think about 20 small wires) 2.5mm thick, I have used 3 cables in parallel (total 7.5cm thick)
The copper pipe is about 60cm deep.
The capacitor across the load is 0.05uf.If the load changes(more bulbs) I had to change the capacitance too.

So if it´s stranded copper wire like this :
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Stranded_lamp_wire.jpg/220px-Stranded_lamp_wire.jpg

and it´s 7.5 cm thick (!) alltogether, then you have a massive ground cable there. It by far doesn´t look that thick in your videos.
Yeah that is way out of my budget (couple of hundred euros) and the wire i use so far (2.5mm single) yields no effect because it is probably too thin (just what i had at that length).

EDIT: I looked at it again, i think Romerouk really means mm rather than cm if he refers to the green,red,gray wires coming off the center cables.

[Groundloop]

@aether22,

When I run the oscillator at 5,1 Volt / 0,25 Ampere, WITHOUT
any load on the output, then the main frequency is 15KHz. There
are some over harmonics at 30KHz and 64KHz also. WITH load (the
spark gap going) the oscillator is making so much noise over the RF
band that a fixed frequency measurement is not possible with my
spectrum analyzer.

Groundloop.

[broli]

@aether22,

When I run the oscillator at 5,1 Volt / 0,25 Ampere, WITHOUT
any load on the output, then the main frequency is 15KHz. There
are some over harmonics at 30KHz and 64KHz also. WITH load (the
spark gap going) the oscillator is making so much noise over the RF
band that a fixed frequency measurement is not possible with my
spectrum analyzer.

Groundloop.

Faraday cage around spark gap to block radio waves? However the inductor is probably also emitting radio waves.

[xenomorphlabs]

Or a choke on the scope leads maybe?

[baroutologos]

@Romerouk,

I am deeply undestand what you say. Experimentation takes time, MONEY and time! My main persistent point here, is that you should just secure you have OU in the first place instead of going to other setups which will take you time, eat you money and maybe do not show any value IF the basic principle is not true.

OU means a definite fool-proof measurment of input, in need with empirical means
definite fool-proof measurment of output (FWBR, smoothed voltages, currents and known loads)

If those figures remain obscure or "I guess so" then no real point IMO in striving this direction.

ps: you are good with your hands! Sometime i will show you my collection of experiments and outfit.