Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[WilbyInebriated]

and even, it is useless for transmitting big powers at a distance because of a not perfect coupling and of the losses in the surrounding.

so by that logic our present power grid is "useless for transmitting big powers at a distance because of a not perfect coupling and losses in the surrounding"... 

[wattsup]

I wish to correct in my previous post that the grounds were not used at the same time. After the radiator was buried, they ran a wire to the area were they did the demo but the wire stayed on the ground unused. Then they connected the ground faucet and did the first or major part of the demo. That showed five bulbs being lit with battery and without battery. They then removed the black ground wire going to the ground faucet and connected it to the buried radiator wire and then showed again five bulbs, both times with and without the battery connected.

In the second ground trial they also connected the bulb to the ground wire but at the point before it enters through the transformer. Hmmmmmmmm. So this shows that the ground going through the transformer or not plays no effect on the output.

So one side of the bulbs are going to either the radiator or ground piping for the negative potential. Now if you consider that presently we accept that electricity "travels" from negative to positive, either ground is good enough to provide the bulb with that one side of the power requirement.

So the device in itself is only providing the other side of the power requirement to the bulbs.

The other side of the bulb, or the positive side is also connected to the output transformer. What is hard to see is any direct connection between the output transformer itself and the green box. This is really a bummer. I can see a white wire coming out one end of the transformer (the side the ground lead exits the transformer) but cannot see where it is going.

Regarding the spark gap. It is very fine and rather quiet unlike spark gaps we see in Tesla coil devices. We know that when lightning hits the ground, there is a ground bolt that rises to meet the lighting coming from the sky. It is about 2/3rds from the sky and 1/3rd from the ground before they meet. I think that the TK spark gap is doing the same thing. At each spark, the ground rushes in to meet the actual spark side. This would explain how the ground potential is entering that side of the bulbs.

So the question is to produce positive potential complimentary to the negative potential available from the ground lead. So if this device is producing positive potential, we know it also has to produce negative potential inside the device since both potentials in the device will occur at once.

But all the bulb needs is the positive side of that potential, basically creating a one wire light bulb that is grounded to earth but still considered as one wire. This means that the device itself it not producing all the potential required by the load. So actually the device is not powering the load or consuming energy as per say. It is basically producing a power loop onto which the other side of the bulb is connected to only the positive potential of the device.

I have seen very low consumptions when doing this with my pulsing coils on leds but TK is doing it in major voltage and amp levels with the spark gap.

The SR193 video is also very interesting but he is not using an outer 6 turn coil and his system works. He is also not using the inverter since he goes from DC directly to up his first stage. Could TK's outer coil simply be a ruse? SR193 also says the transformer core is ferromagnetic.

Suffice to say that you absolutely need an Earth ground wire to do any experiments in this regard.

Anyone doing spark gap tests can simply try to connect a bulb to the positive side of the spark gap and the other side of the bulb to a true grounding point. Maybe TK's transformer coil is also a ruse and the real effect is so simple they needed to dress it up a bit. I will try some tests on this. I just got 15 feet of 0 AWG stranded wire and connected one end to my home copper piping and the other end is now on my work desk. More fun again.

The point is this. The first step is one side goes to Earth Ground. Then you find what positive voltage - frequency - spark gap aperture - is required to light up them bulbs. Once you know that then the question is how to mobilize it into a loop. Sounds simple enough for guys with sparkies. You would need variable spark researching ability.

The image below is when TK was pointing to a device in his documents. The circular coil looks very much like a Tesla Pancake coil. The second image is him again pointing to another device.

Question: Has anyone or any group looked at the long video and done a transcript. If anyone knows Russian and can download the AVI video, I would be interested is asking you to look at certain time ranges and translate the discussions. This would be interesting.

[exnihiloest]

so by that logic our present power grid is "useless for transmitting big powers at a distance because of a not perfect coupling and losses in the surrounding"... 

You have no idea of the order of magnitude in question.
With HV oscillating coupling at long distance, we are not in the range of some % of losses as in the power grid, we are in the best cases in the range of some % of transmitted energy.
Even if we could attain 50% of transmitted energy by not too far distances between transmitter and receiver (and we are far far from being able to do it), when it is question of GW, we see that the principle is not relevant.
But if we want to heat the countryside in order the birds to feel better, well it is a good idea. 

[WilbyInebriated]

You have no idea of the order of magnitude in question.

there is no way you could possibly know what ideas i have...

With HV oscillating coupling at long distance, we are not in the range of some % of losses as in the power grid, we are in the best cases in the range of some % of transmitted energy.
Even if we could attain 50% of transmitted energy by not too far distances between transmitter and receiver (and we are far far from being able to do it), when it is question of GW, we see that the principle is not relevant.
But if we want to heat the countryside in order the birds to feel better, well it is a good idea. 

you're moving your goalposts now... you didn't state anything about magnitudes nor percentages in your first blanket statement. you said it was "useless" for two reason and gave no further qualification. as an aside, i would be curious to see your data on wireless power transfer being done on a large scale. ie: grid scale.

[baroutologos]

I was thinking in the footsteps of Prentice for...

In case anyone is inspired by my suggested experiment, i tested a two transistor Kacher so far. Idications show that it is perfectly workable.