Understanding electricity in the TPU.

[Qwert]

@wattsup
I'm also like you, not trained in this field.  But unlike you, I don't practice this. I have only some basic knowledge. I am interested in this forum as a potential user of the TPU. I decided to compare older articles from this forum to the new ones. I found some articles of the past which look important (at least to me) but  nobody respond to them. Here are two of them; I think they can bring some help to your issues:

1.  Quote of Steven Marks' words:

"If the plate voltage is not rectified then it is AC with a potential 60 Hz frequency.
That combines with the 5 volt 60 Hz in the coil of the htr transformer and generally amounts to nothing. In fact the power of the 5 volt transformer amounts to nothing.
It is an insignificant power supply except when the two transformers get slightly out of phase with each other, or when they are connected in reverse of one another."

My find for the above:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7926.msg201683#msg201683
"I got confirmation from a friend on my ideas that two saturable inductors can be used in parallel with a few nanoseconds of delay ( few feet of wire ) to create a tail-biter circuit. First one snaps the dc power off and the second is ready with collapse to turn the dc back on..

The trick is to wire the delay in the trigger of number 2 and space the repetition rate of the event so there is enough time for this process to occur.

i.e.. number 2 fires first but number 1 is still conducting.... then 1 fires and no one is conducting... then a few nanoseconds later number 2 goes into collapse and conducts ... so the result is a sharp snap off snap on of your hv dc bias

may be why two are present on the more powerful unit"

2.  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4297.msg86495#msg86495

Quote:

"A long time ago in this forum, I posted a link to a web site showing a graph of the inrush current before the magnetic field is established. I am lazy to search for it again, sorry. It shows that the inrush current at the beginning has a parabolic form, not linear.
Before that post, I described one of my test with BEMF and a simple transformer with two identical coils. The BEMF wasn?t my point. The point was that when an impulse is sent to a transformer after any residual field is gone it behaves in completely different way. In that test I described how the input and output was measured, all at DC level. What it showed that the output current was exceeding the input (two identical coils!!!) by about 30% (if I remember correctly) and all, again, was measured after using rectifies and smoothing capacitors. However, it wasn?t overunity. The point was, don?t send the next impulse while there is any residual magnetic flux left (that is where an iron core might be a problem, but I am not sure). What spherics is describing is a little different. He is saying that one should send the second impulse right after the first one and at the same time as close as possible to get into the space of the expending field created by the first impulse. That is where my example with the bicycles is coming from. So, here are two conditions. One is that the pulse has to be short enough to avoid any residual flux left for the second pair of pulses, and each second pulse in each pair of pulses should be very close. What spherics is describing is that there is a strange effect discovered with the above conditions".

Anyway, I guess I found the link to the article the author mentions at the beginning:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=712.msg4727#msg4727

And another interesting article of this author:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=712.msg4638#msg4638

[Qwert]

There is another possible link for a suggestion mentioned by Kames:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=712.msg4767#msg4767

However, the link he is mentioning is incorrect. The proper one is this:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_9/8.html

I've just checked it.

[Mannix]

@EM

Can you clarify these connections please

[sparks]

  @wattsup

    The capacitor problem you mention is overcome when a tuned resonant circuit is used as an electrical energy storage scheme.  The system itself is the storage device not just the capacitor or the inductor.  The inductor can pump a capacitor totally dry.  Or transfer all of the charge on a single capacitor plate  to the other.  By use of a device like a spark gap or diode the input from scource to tuned system can be automatically introduced to the resonant circuit when the voltage of the power supply exceeds the voltage of the capacitor.  The power scource can be capacitively coupled to the resonant system so that very little current passes through the spark gap the spark gap itself acting as a capacitor in series with the tuned resonant circuit and a current limit device.  This is just capacitve coupling of electrical systems.  The current inside the tuned circuit increases in intensity with each input pulse until saturation of the capacitor or inductor is reached. 

[innovation_station]

sparks...  bro ... 

if a spark gap is used .. AND I DONT CARE THE CURCUIT ...

something ELSE IS HAPPINING ..

it links DIRRECTLY TO ORBIT! 

W


wires off into space ... and a potencial diffrence in the CAP!

it goes into a locked loop orbit ...  with space .. a constant exchange of engery! from 1 charge ...

this is how i found orbit! it will not show on a dc multi meter ... METER MUST BE ON AC .. AND IT OSCOLATES..  ALL BY ITS SELF! 

ok  now i can kick it in the a$$ and tune it ....    to match the output winding resonnance ... 

i then cold remove the control  tuneing coil ..  wich is only required to tune it ..

peace!

try it ..  put a neo on a string and watch it move for ever in the spin vortex ..    plus  it will sync with the cosmic  orbits...

when the cap finally oscolates to 0  it is replenished ... from nature