Understanding electricity in the TPU.

[otto]

Hello all,

@wattsup

I know that you are a real TPUer. A very clever one. And I enjoy every time you wright a post - of course not that from "black Friday", ha,ha.

You mentioned reactive power.

Can you tell me and all the people here what reactive power is? Just to clarify a little bit.

Otto

[wattsup]

@otto

Thank you for your question which is pertinent.

We have all been playing around with reactive power. It is higher voltage output that anyone here can make like the guys in the JT thread. I made up to 800 volts with just a center toroid, 1500 vdc with the Tesla Ozone Patent. High voltage but very low amperage. When you put a real load on this output it will show a few volts only, remove the load and voltage jumps in the hundreds. Consumption is micro amps.

The OTPU is two systems that are totally non-connected. One system is in the OTPU so without the bulbs connected to the OTPU SM could show voltage of 91.2 vdc. But this is reactive power and cannot do anything useful besides making your volt meter read an output. Then he connected his battery driven bulbs, possibly even DC bulbs that he used with printed 100watts on them. The batteries, maybe 12-24vdc lit the bulbs from one side, and the reactive power of the OTPU showed the voltage as 91.2 vdc. This I am now totally and irrefutably convinced this is the way SM did his OTPU video. I also know how he made his other videos.

http://cgi.ebay.ca/12-PCS-A19-LOW-VOLTAGE-12V-DC-LIGHT-BULB-50W-FROST-/110555756042?cmd=ViewItem&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19bda2f60a

@all

SM said he went to great lengths to ensure his videos were done in a way so as to show the power output of his devices and leave no doubt. What great lengths? Great lengths means you put a voltmeter and an ammeter and a scope on the output before and while you apply a load. It means you put your voltmeter and ammeter on the wall plugs before you plug the bulbs and while you plug the bulbs.

Did he do that? No. Never. Not once. The great lengths for SM means he did everything possible to make a video "à la David Copperfield". So this means anything and everything is legal terrain to fool you into thinking what you think you see is reality. This is the level of his great lengths.

Regarding the bulb brightness with 1997 cameras, any of that possible compensation would have been evident in all the video and not just on the bulbs. The camera cannot distinguish or modify the brightness of only one part of a frame, it will modify the whole frame. 800 watts of bulbs being lit would have blinded everyone in that room. If the camera compensated for the brightness, then everything else would have been totally black. But it would not have blinded them if the bulbs were only 12 or 24 volts pulsed DC with 200 9vdc batteries under the hood, of course you see 800 volts but again that is reactive power output on the voltmeter, but the bulbs are really only need 12-24 vdc. That's why he never connected the voltmeter while there was a load.

Question: I have one output that is fed both a 12vdc of 2 amps and a reactive power of 110vdc at micro amps. What will the volt meter read???????? What will the bulb receive??????

The STPU was almost melting away. What coil will still perform his function while it is melting away? There has to be a stable driving force for that to happen. Just like the 6TPU. It is loaded with batteries but not to drive a real 100 watts bulb. He takes a DC bulb, puts it on the tall thin lamp stand that is now plugged into the wall socket. This time SM cannot hide batteries in the stand. So he modifies the bottom wall plug again. This time he puts a small bridge rectifier in the wall plug with a resistor to bring down the output of the bottom plug to 12-24vdc. You and I see the bulb is plugged into the wall so we automatically think it is getting 120vac at 100 watts. We take a mental snap shot of that brightness for a mental comparison when he plugs it onto the 6TPU. He puts the voltmeter on the 6TPU and reads 121.8 vdc or around there. But again this is only reactive power. If the 6TPU was really putting out only 12vdc or 24vdc, would you need an inverter to run a TV or a drill? Hence that inverter video.....

Anyways, I did not post this information to start a war. That was really what I was afraid of. Are TPUers ready to look at the facts, the cold hard facts. Maybe not yet and I am sorry then to have jumped the gun. Can you treat this in an impersonal manner and not attack each other and not make childish claims that "I am bitter that I did not make a TPU". I am not bitter at all. I have done many tests and have a good idea on how to go forward but it is not because of SM. It's thanks to all of you. The realization that SM has used two power methods to do his videos fits perfectly into his video methodology and is only a greater clarification for me to move forward. Where SM failed, we will now move forward and succeed without relying on his design parameters that were only good to produce reactive power. Technically we are much further advanced then SM ever was. The only main difference is we are honest about what we do and how we do it and also about the results we get. We don't go around faking videos or results. We don't take this effort as a David Copperfield type fake-o-rama where anything and everything you can do to fool people is all right.

Sorry again to have ruffled some feathers but I am sure you will all be back in the sky soon enough. I will now stop posting anything new about the SM TPUs and return to our regular programming.

Maybe one last thing. If you think I am pleased to have had to post this, then you are definitely mistaken. It would be very easy for me to just bury this info and forget about it, hoping that regardless, guys here will eventually find another angle that has more promise then following so many SMnitudes. But I thought if it does not help some on the forum, it may help others that are always hanging around but never post. Proof of this is a note I took down just before posting. Before my post there were 31190 views of this thread. Since my post there are now 32707 views. Surely those that posted here since were not the only ones reading this thread, so, to all of you out there in TPUdom and this goes for me also.................. back to the bench. There is more work to be done. For me, the SM TPU saga is now solved. Using the methods outlined, anyone can now replicate how SM did his videos right down to a "T". Very easy to do.

[bolt]

I don't think we have to use tubes because of SS's are smoking in these circuits. I have problem with SS  switches when there is already DC current flowing in the secondary, when a pulse hit the primary. In these cases, when you scope the gate you will see a lot of noise. But when I use tubes, all the noise disappear, and the control frequency's are clear as it should be.

There must be over 1000 patents which have OU potential and a hundred patents anyone of which if built and tested on a grand scale like the dozens of OU motors would have created world changing events. Due greed, corruption and just big egos followed by suppression many of these OU motors and devices remain hidden away or museum pieces.

OU is not a pipe dream its always been here. If you doubt that then you need to go back to basics and start to read Teslas work.  Its only the method which leads to OU.  OU starts with the most simple form of energy which is lightning otherwise known as static.

TO suggest SM TPU is fake is total BS. It certainly doesn't extract power grid energy nor is it powered by some microwave beam.  These ideas are dream't up by those that can not appreciate that devices which create the conditions to allow energy transformation have been around for a very long time. Not forgetting the TPU was used and tested in many many locations including several States, Oz and NZ that I know of oh, and up in a plane. So no time to frig these locations with hidden batteries and specially crafted lamp holders.

Not only is there the TPU to consider but recently Kapandze. Now if this is a trick box that doesn't work I be more then happy to take one!

I seen and read too much to think otherwise. To me OU is no different to having access to air or water....they are naturally occurring commodities.

[otto]

@wattsup

again a question:

OK, reactice power is useless. But what if you would use a combination of reactive power AND lets say 24V from a battery? Or 12V?

Otto

[EMdevices]

For everyone's information:

1)  the joule thief is not an OU device
2)  Tesla coils are not OU devices
3)  there are no OU devices!  ( only receivers of energy).

Stop living a fantasy and build a coil to receive energy. Lester Hendershot, Hubbard, Steven Mark, TESLA, Henry Moray, and a bunch of others have done it,  can you?

BTW,  The quotes I posted earlier were from 82 years ago, newspaper articles about the Hendershot device, makes you wonder doesn't it?


EM