All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

Chesnyt I am afraid you did not address my question.  Perhaps if we run through it one more time.

You asked:

@Mark E:
Replication seems to be very important to you so you must have attempted to replicate Stan's demonstration fuel cell, right?  Could you at least show your attempted replication of Meyer's cell?

Your question states the predicate assumption that:  "you must have attempted to replicate Stan's demonstration fuel cell".  You separately state that you agree with the premise that the burden of proof for extraordinary claims falls only upon the claimant.  But, since I have never claimed that Stan Meyer's extraordinary claims are true, there is no extraordinary claim on my part that is served by replicating his devices.  So how is it you came up with your predicate assumption that I "must have" done so?

[chessnyt]

Chesnyt I am afraid you did not address my question.  Perhaps if we run through it one more time.

You asked:
Your question states the predicate assumption that:  "you must have attempted to replicate Stan's demonstration fuel cell".  You separately state that you agree with the premise that the burden of proof for extraordinary claims falls only upon the claimant.  But, since I have never claimed that Stan Meyer's extraordinary claims are true, there is no extraordinary claim on my part that is served by replicating his devices.  So how is it you came up with your predicate assumption that I "must have" done so?

I have already answered your question.  I understand that it is hard for you to answer a simple "yes" or "no" question, thus it doesn't surprise me that you do not understand an answer that required more information than yes or no. 

[MarkE]

Sadly, you have made it obvious that your predicate was disingenuous.  Such is life.

[chessnyt]

Sadly, you have made it obvious that your predicate was disingenuous.  Such is life.

Sadly, there are those who would love to put words in my mouth and jump to conclusions based on speculation, but such is life.

[SeaMonkey]

I am ready to collaborate if somebody wants to make an 18 cell tube.

6 sets, triple tube.

as per Stephen Meyers.

Stan and Stephen have their reasons for using
those types of configurations but they're not
necessary and are not recommended for early
stage efforts.  The cells used to perfect the
driving techniques may be of simplest construction.

Once that process is well understood then there are
numerous ways to accomplish increased surface area.

Regarding the concept of Proof:  The most persuasive
proofs are those attained by those who are seeking
proof.  While it may be convenient to observe proofs
which others have attained there may yet remain doubts
or suspicions.  In order to remove all doubts the proofs
must be accomplished by each who would seek Truth and
the satisfaction which it imparts.

There is no need to attempt to persuade others in
sophistic debate.  Those who are unable to believe in
certain possibilities are not prepared to seek truth.

Let them be.