All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

They are not "replications" per se, since they are not
duplications of Meyer's circuitry or constructions.  There
are significant differences.

In due time everyone who desires may see one.

In the meantime it would be beneficial for those who
truly want to "see" to experiment very simply and very
inexpensively.  There is no substitute for self-created
"proof."

Les Banki has done his part in supplying documents
which motivate towards the realization of success.

Note the wording:  "which motivate towards the realization of success".  There is no statement that Les Banki or anyone else has actually succeeded.  There isn't a promise that one following Sea Monkey into the back alley will succeed.  The Ohio judge summarized why when he found Stanley Meyer an "egregious fraud".

[Cap-Z-ro]

I guess some still chose to ignore my earlier post...the fact that "judges" are as reliable as those who employ them.

Both have dubious credibility, to say the very very least.

And...I would like anyone to logically challenge another fact...

NOBODY, but nobody here knows anything conclusive about the viability of Myres' circuit.

Sorry if I cut the legs off anyone's bully pulpit with the axe of common sense.

Well, not really.

Regards...

[MarkE]

I guess some still chose to ignore my earlier post...the fact that "judges" are as reliable as those who employ them.

Both have dubious credibility, to say the very very least.

And...I would like anyone to logically challenge another fact...

NOBODY, but nobody here knows anything conclusive about the viability of Myres' circuit.

Sorry if I cut the legs off anyone's bully pulpit with the axe of common sense.

Well, not really.

Regards...

Have fun trying to chop down established facts:

Fact: Stanley Meyer made his claims over 20 years ago.
Fact: Stanley Meyer's claims are extraordinary.
Fact: Stanley Meyer's claims have never been proven true.
Fact: It is a requirement of all utility patents that the specification describe in sufficient detail how to practice the claims such that a person with ordinary skill in the art can so practice them without undue experimentation.
Fact: No one has ever shown that they can successfully reproduce Stanley Meyer's claims by practicing his patents.
Fact: Three expert witnesses in the 1996 investor lawsuit testified that Stanley Meyer's scheme used ordinary electrolysis.
Fact: Ordinary electrolysis is far less than 100% efficient.
Fact: Stanley Meyer was sued multiple times by different investors, and was forced to return those investors' monies as a result of losing those lawsuits that alleged breach of contract by fraud.
Fact: No one has produced any evidence that the judges in any of the actions against Stan Meyer were tainted.


Given the failure of the many who have tried to reproduce Stanley Meyer's claims from his patent one may reasonably conclude that the patents did not describe what Stan Meyer claimed.  that amounts to fraud in the patent applications.

[Cap-Z-ro]

What a load of unmitigated long winded bullshit...saying absolutely nothing and proving or disproving absolutely nothing, except that what i posted still stands.

Not since MileyCHighrus has such dimwittery been displayed on this forum.

Regards...


Edit:

I would also add...I kinda lost track, can anyone tell me just how many lying so called "structural engineers" lined up to back up the official lie on just how those buildings went down on 9/11 ?

And for that matter how many lying so called "scientists" lined up to back up the official lie on "Global Warming"...not to mention those that kept their mouths shut about the fraudulent evidence ?

*awaits another blast of hot air*

Regards...

[MarkE]

What a load of unmitigated long winded bullshit...saying absolutely nothing and proving or disproving absolutely nothing, except that what i posted still stands.

Not since MileyCHighrus has such dimwittery been displayed on this forum.

Regards...

Unilaterally declare what you like.  Hurl all the insults that you like.  Neither is hardly an effective substitute for or counter to actual reasoned argument.