**UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

[fuzzytomcat]

WELL.  It seems that we are finally getting to the meat of the issue.  Pure unadulterated spite - and that's enough for you and Harvey to justify this hiding of the truth.  You'd rather indulge your malice than allow the liberal distribution of data to the public.  You'd go to such EXTRAORDINARY lengths to keep the public in the dark?  And yet you pretend to be concerned about Open Source.  Glen you may not like me.  And for that matter I may not like you.  But it's irrelevant.  The need for Clean Green and all attendant concerns is far greater than your personal feelings or even mine.  This is information that should be broadcast as far and wide as possible.  Not hidden in a dying thread on EF.com with a dusty dialogue muttering about it's possible imprecisions.  It is the stuff of really great hopes and that's what's lacking.  If this were more widely known - who knows how much more confidently would others work on this and similar - or even develop their own more extensively?  The lasersabers, or Pirate - Goto - Berdini - EVERYONE?  You're effectively trying to silence this technology and it's implications and the thesis that required these results.  That's not well done Glen.  Not well done at all.

And for the record - just to remind everyone how hopelessly I fell into a project that you'd designed many months back.  When I asked you to post the information here on OU.com - you explained that you could not do so because you did not have the bandwidth?  or Harti did not have the bandwidth.  Since I could hardly understand either excuse I let it ride.  I was wrong.  I should have moved heaven and earth to get the data here.  Because on Harti's forum - you WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DELETE.   

And how dare you imply that I'm rich.  I am NOT rich.  What a LIE.

Rosemary

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html


http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

[WilbyInebriated]

With Regards to ZIP files.

Skydrive has a 50MB upload limit for any single file. Some of my spreadsheets of the tests exceeded this limit and therefore needed to be compressed to allow upload.

then don't use skydrive... put the data in a sql database (this avoids your upload limit problem @skydrive) and whip up a simple script to select the necessary data... it's a simple 'high school' solution.

ZIP technology is an industry standard that has been around since the early days of DOS and it is expected that this is well understood by all persons qualified to evaluate these analyses. However, if there are any who are having problems with unzipping these files and would like assistance in doing so feel free to PM me and I will step you through the extremely simple high school steps of doing so.

or you could PM glen and step him through the extremely simple high school steps of properly sizing an image...

Additionally, the high resolution data (100,000 samples per 10 divisions) will not fit in Excel versions prior to 2007. Therefore, I took the time to create an Access Program for those with older versions of Microsoft Office that allows them to peer into this data at high resolution with zoom charts and see the many instances of high amplitude pulses that are simply missing in the much lower resolution data of 10,000 samples per screen.

this is not an issue when using a sql database instead of some proprietary microcrap software (excel).

All of this has been available 100% of the time with absolutely no reservations from the time of publicizing the results. Any attempts to infer otherwise should be considered subterfuge and an attempt to besmirch Glen's good name and therefore should be summarily dismissed as the rhetoric it is.

Furthermore, Glens tests and all of the data associated with Glens tests remain his property. He has graciously shared those tests and their results with the world to benefit us all in any way it can. I wish I could say the same for the South African tests. ALL of the test data from the listed testing agencies is missing, withheld, or never even happened. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the South African group to at the very least match Glen's tests and public display of data if they wish to continue boasting "OPEN SOURCE".

what about this harv? why just test13? why not all of them?

I ..... Glen Lettenmaier, am withdrawing any use of my complete Test number "Thirteen" (13) data and image files for further usage, evaluation or publication, other than what has already been seen and posted at Energetic Forum, Panacea Bocaf and my "copyrighted" Scribd publication.

Sincerely,
Glen A Lettenmaier (aka FuzzyTomCat)

Otherwise the Entire OPEN SOURCE community has no choice but conclude they are protecting their Intellectual Property and the all of the claims otherwise are nothing but a ruse for publicity.

Harvey

denied. logical fallacy, false dilemma.

[truthbeknown]

I guess Loner missed this comment but she will read and post here just as day follows night.
And who cares that you don't like me Rosemary because nobody ever asked you to. And really, reviving a thread is what you do everyday with your COP>17 thread. If nobody comments on it then you have to say some Blah Blah to keep it on the front page just as you have done on every forum you have posted in.  So really, what some people would like to see are pictures and videos of the work you say is being conducted "on campus." So you say you can't post the parts list and so on because of "thieves" so how about some pics and videos? We have to wonder why?
I'm sure the collaborators could shed some light on things but so could you with some effort. You are so good at deleting posts that don't suit you and editing even your own posts its pretty hard to understand your agenda. I hope this thread can truly show all the truths about your whatever device.


J.

Still waiting for the pics and videos.....Even STEFAN wants to see some and posted results......

[fuzzytomcat]

Tell me where you got this photograph?  Is it yours?  And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests?  To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test.  And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE?  HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET?  is the question.

Well ..... using the common "SEARCH" feature at Energetic Forum where your membership was banned ......

http://www.energeticforum.com/68575-post2766.html   ( September 22, 2009 )
This is where my photograph ( Picture005.jpg ) of a Fluke 123 ScopeMeter used in the Ainslie - Murakami Negitive Dominant Waveform Generator circuit test using the Tektronix TDS 3054C as shown in your COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie thread ... POST #2766

http://www.energeticforum.com/68576-post2767.html   ( September 22, 2009 )
This is your Post #2767 a response to the prior posting that I did .......

FUZZY - very well done. Many, many thanks for all that info.

Like others have said you really need to have that condition of yours professionally taken care of .... it can be quite a distraction for us all ......

[truthbeknown]

Rosemary Ainslie

    * Moderator
    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 1171
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Online)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #751 on: Today at 01:20:48 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote

Quote from: truthbeknown on October 28, 2010, 10:23:36 PM


    So. Where are the results, pics, and videos?


And what exactly are your 'rights' that you can DEMAND results pictures or videos?  The readers here Truthbeknown are very well aware of the fact that we have a project here that is funded by those students who GIVE THEIR TIME to this project.  No-one is paid for their involvement.  It is extracurricular and all are doing their best to fit in the tasks and tests as and when they can.  For my part it is enough that this is on campus that the results will be both recorded and supervised under the guidance of experts.

If and when you devote YOUR life to the promotion of clean green as I am doing here - then I think you will be well qualified to DEMAND a performance to some kind of exacting standard.  But I see a dearth of experimental involvement by yourself and find it rather distasteful that you should demand anything at all of me.  Do you presume to think that I am working as I do - to satisfy your time table or that I am doing all this to gratify your requirements on any issue at all?  I assure you you are mistaken.

Rosemary




This is what she said in answering my question when I posted it in her thread. I figured it best be brought over here before she deletes my posts in her thread....a moderator with a delete finger.

My reply to her on this is that she doesn't know anything about me and what I have promoted for clean green...and I am not obligated to share anything with her about it....BUT...she is the one who keeps posting about things going on "on campus" and not showing the details in either written word or pics or videos. So the readers can decide if its all talk and no show for themselves.