Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


**UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

Started by fuzzytomcat, October 27, 2010, 12:12:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

fuzzytomcat

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on October 28, 2010, 03:52:11 AM
I see we're falling off the page again.  I'm amending so that this can be read.  There were only two
tests that I wanted in full record.  Test 3 and test 13.  The rest are largely irrelevant.  I've just
looked through the link download Wilby.  Thanks for that. 

Ok.  I've paged through them all and see - as day follows night - that the sample range number that
has been 'kept' or 'recorded' are ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT.  There are a certain number of samples that
are required to give a 'fair' reflection of the actual test results.  I can't remember the exact number
but it was about 100 or thereby.  Any more or less than these multiple samples and Tektronix DO
NOT GUARANTEE the results.  What Glen has RETAINED are those tests that either give more or
less samples.  So.  He may indeed not have deleted them all.  He's only deleted those that are
referenced - or relevant.  I see too that he's been using my old Fluke.  LOL.  Aaron must have
weakened and sent it through.

Wilby.  Can I ask you a favour.  Obviously only when you have time.  Can you try and open those
links on Fuzzy's other info.  And then see if you can access tests 3 and 13.  I want to find out which
samples he actually retained here too.  I wonder if he's actually just made the irrelevant samples
available for public view and buried the significant test results elsewhere.  Thank GOD I've still got
the raw data of these early tests.  But even here I'll have to get someone to find them to down load
it for me.  And meanwhile I also have those test results from our paper.
 

Indeed.  There's an agenda here guys.  It's very disturbing.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

This is crazy ..... you can't even post once without something that's so false makes me wonder what kind of drugs your maid is slipping you .....

AGAIN - The link you deleted in your thread ..... one that has been posted numerous times in many forums is -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

Everthing in existance on my work with the experimental device is there ...... "EVERYTHING", nothing is missing or retained ...... what nonsense is this .....

Place the little mouse pointer over the file and click on it ...... how hard can this be, do you really need Wilby for this task ??

Fluke meter what are you talking about .... the only Fluke scope I know of Aaron has and used it once over a year ago, that's it . Your confusing the test equipment you used I think it was in the Quantum October 2002 article a Fluke 199 some low quality LED unit, nothing like the Tektronix TDS 3054c or the Tektronix DPO 3054 I used to collect data with.

Harvey

With Regards to ZIP files.

Skydrive has a 50MB upload limit for any single file. Some of my spreadsheets of the tests exceeded this limit and therefore needed to be compressed to allow upload.

ZIP technology is an industry standard that has been around since the early days of DOS and it is expected that this is well understood by all persons qualified to evaluate these analyses. However, if there are any who are having problems with unzipping these files and would like assistance in doing so feel free to PM me and I will step you through the extremely simple high school steps of doing so.

Additionally, the high resolution data (100,000 samples per 10 divisions) will not fit in Excel versions prior to 2007. Therefore, I took the time to create an Access Program for those with older versions of Microsoft Office that allows them to peer into this data at high resolution with zoom charts and see the many instances of high amplitude pulses that are simply missing in the much lower resolution data of 10,000 samples per screen.

All of this has been available 100% of the time with absolutely no reservations from the time of publicizing the results. Any attempts to infer otherwise should be considered subterfuge and an attempt to besmirch Glen's good name and therefore should be summarily dismissed as the rhetoric it is.

Furthermore, Glens tests and all of the data associated with Glens tests remain his property. He has graciously shared those tests and their results with the world to benefit us all in any way it can. I wish I could say the same for the South African tests. ALL of the test data from the listed testing agencies is missing, withheld, or never even happened. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the South African group to at the very least match Glen's tests and public display of data if they wish to continue boasting "OPEN SOURCE".

Otherwise the Entire OPEN SOURCE community has no choice but conclude they are protecting their Intellectual Property and the all of the claims otherwise are nothing but a ruse for publicity.

Harvey

Rosemary Ainslie



DON'T PRESUME TO CLAIM THAT I AM CRAZY WHEN YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT I DO NOT HAVE
THE EYES TO NAVIGATE THESE COMPLEX SYSTEMS.  WHY DID YOU EVER EVER EVER DELETE THOSE
FILES.  IT IS A TRAVESTY OF OPEN SOURCE  DISCIPLINES AND FLIES IN THE FACE OF OPEN
SOURCE INTERESTS.  I DEVOTED ENDLESS HOURS IN HELPING YOU GET THE DESIRED EFFECT.  I
FEEL I SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO ACCESS THE FILES EASILY AND I WOULD PREFER IT THAT OUR
READING PUBLIC CAN ALSO DO SO.  YOU HAVE AN AGENDA AND IT'S OBVIOUS.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE.  YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

fuzzytomcat

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on October 28, 2010, 04:31:22 AM

DON'T PRESUME TO CLAIM THAT I AM CRAZY WHEN YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT I DO NOT HAVE
THE EYES TO NAVIGATE THESE COMPLEX SYSTEMS.  WHY DID YOU EVER EVER EVER DELETE THOSE
FILES.  IT IS A TRAVESTY OF OPEN SOURCE  DISCIPLINES AND FLIES IN THE FACE OF OPEN
SOURCE INTERESTS.  I DEVOTED ENDLESS HOURS IN HELPING YOU GET THE DESIRED EFFECT.  I
FEEL I SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO ACCESS THE FILES EASILY AND I WOULD PREFER IT THAT OUR
READING PUBLIC CAN ALSO DO SO.  YOU HAVE AN AGENDA AND IT'S OBVIOUS.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE.  YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE.  YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE.  YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE.  YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.


wow .... I thought I was seeing things, had to print it three times ..... I'm still hiding text ..... where on this page ??

WHAT ??

Rosemary Ainslie

Tell me where you got this photograph?  Is it yours?  And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests?  To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test.  And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE?  HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET?  is the question.