**UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

[fuzzytomcat]

Tell me where you got this photograph?  Is it yours?  And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests?  To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test.  And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE?  HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET?  is the question.

You know fully ..... this was from Aarons Negative Dominate Wave Form Circuit testing and evaluation, when I went to his home 800 miles away to verify his results with my experimental device and took some preliminary tests with the Tektronix TDS 3054C he had in his possession using my custom made proto type 10 Ohm inductor.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Now.  Let me state all this again.  I CANNOT UNZIP THOSE FILES.  IT IS NOT WITHIN MY CAPABILITY.   IT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.  THE PRIME DATA AND THE WAVEFORMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT  AS THEY WERE 0N THE FORUM.  THEY ARE NO LONGER AVAIALABLE.  OUR READING PUBLIC AND I WOULD PREFER TO SEE THEM WHERE THEY BELONG.  NOT IN SOME IRRELEVANT LITTLE FILE IN GLEN'S NAME WHICH CANNOT BE EASILY ACCESSED. 

And don't give me those complex excuses. Just put the data back for open source to see what gives.  Anything less and it's obviously being done with the sole intention of making that data inaccessible to me, in the first instance and to our reading public in the second instance.

I will then take the trouble to go through all those post where Glen specifically refused to allow anyone to post those waveforms on the forum.  I can't myself do this.  But I can get someone to do it for me.  In other words it would be relatively EASY for all that information to be posted for permanent record.  So this nonsense about zipped files and God knows what other excuse Harvey is bringing to the table - is spurious nonsense.  The only thing preventing the reading public from seeing the actual data and the actual facts of those tests is Glen's preference to keep you, and us - IN THE DARK.

That smacks of AGENDA and AGENDA and AGENDA.  There is NOTHING in that which can be mistakenly construed as acting in the best interests of Open Source.  Any pretense by either of them that this is a residual or any concern is therefore evidentially a whole lot of rubbish.  More hand waving.

Rosemary

EDITED

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You know fully ..... this was from Aarons Negative Dominate Wave Form Circuit testing and evaluation, when I went to his home 800 miles away to verify his results with my experimental device and took some preliminary tests with the Tektronix TDS 3054C he had in his possession using my custom made proto type 10 Ohm inductor.

NO  I DO NOT KNOW THAT.  I KNOW NOTHING WHERE YOU ARE CONCERNED.  I FIRST NEED TO WADE THROUGH YOUR LIES AND YOUR FACILE EXCUSES.

Please advise everyone here why it is that you DO NOT wish to have the test record easily accessed.  Can you explain this?  Can you dig deep - even if it's yet more lies.  Just tell me whether this forum would be able to support that data?  Or would the quantity of information exceed Harti's bandwidth - and God knows what other nonsense you use for an excuse.  LOL As I remember it you simply REFUSED to post the original data here.  I now know why.  You'd NEVER have been able to delete it.  And you have the bald faced temerity to accuse me of DELETIONS?  WHAT A JOKE.

[fuzzytomcat]

Now.  Let me state all this again. I CANNOT UNZIP THOSE FILES.  IT IS NOT WITHIN MY CAPABILITY.   IT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.  THE PRIME DATA AND THE WAVEFORMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT  AS THEY WERE 0N THE FORUM.  THEY ARE NO LONGER AVAIALABLE.  OUR READING PUBLIC AND I WOULD PREFER TO SEE THEM WHERE THEY BELONG.  NOT IN SOME IRRELEVANT LITTLE FILE IN GLEN'S NAME WHICH CANNOT BE EASILY ACCESSED. 

And don't give me those complex excuses. Just put the data back for open source to see what gives.  Anything less and it's obviously being done with the sole intention of making that data inaccessible to me, in the first instance and to our reading public in the second instance.

I will then take the trouble to go through all those post where Glen specifically refused to allow anyone to post those waveforms on the forum.  I can't myself do this.  But I can get someone to do it for me.  In other words it would be relatively EASY for all that information to be posted for permanent record.  So this nonsense about zipped files and God knows what other excuse Harvey is bringing to the table - is spurious nonsense.  The only thing preventing the reading public from seeing the actual data and the actual facts of those tests is Glen's preference to keep you, and us - IN THE DARK.

That smacks of AGENDA and AGENDA and AGENDA.  There is NOTHING in that which can be mistakenly construed as acting in the best interests of Open Source.  Any pretense by either of them that this is a residual or any concern is therefore evidentially a whole lot of rubbish.  More hand waving.

Rosemary

EDITED

So sad .... take some electronic and some computer classes .... your rich .... maid and all .... feed your dogs fresh cooked veal everyday, get a education like us working folks.

I have no stomach for your unreasonable demands and allegations on my test results and how I document them especially from you ...... how about that COP>17 proof of claim of yours ??

Go back to your pathetic thread and talk about your magnets ..... I really want to see how you use them in your first hot water application .....

[Rosemary Ainslie]

WELL.  It seems that we are finally getting to the meat of the issue.  Pure unadulterated spite - and that's enough for you and Harvey to justify this hiding of the truth.  You'd rather indulge your malice than allow the liberal distribution of data to the public.  You'd go to such EXTRAORDINARY lengths to keep the public in the dark?  And yet you pretend to be concerned about Open Source.  Glen you may not like me.  And for that matter I may not like you.  But it's irrelevant.  The need for Clean Green and all attendant concerns is far greater than your personal feelings or even mine.  This is information that should be broadcast as far and wide as possible.  Not hidden in a dying thread on EF.com with a dusty dialogue muttering about it's possible imprecisions.  It is the stuff of really great hopes and that's what's lacking.  If this were more widely known - who knows how much more confidently would others work on this and similar - or even develop their own more extensively?  The lasersabers, or Pirate - Goto - Berdini - EVERYONE?  You're effectively trying to silence this technology and it's implications and the thesis that required these results.  That's not well done Glen.  Not well done at all.

And for the record - just to remind everyone how hopelessly I fell into a project that you'd designed many months back.  When I asked you to post the information here on OU.com - you explained that you could not do so because you did not have the bandwidth?  or Harti did not have the bandwidth.  Since I could hardly understand either excuse I let it ride.  I was wrong.  I should have moved heaven and earth to get the data here.  Because on Harti's forum - you WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DELETE.   

And how dare you imply that I'm rich.  I am NOT rich.  What a LIE.

Rosemary