Tempest,

Your idea may work.  I doubt Znidarsic hit the correct frequencies in his plasma experiments.  We need to make sure we're not over-looking something.  This is a good start IMO.

GB

Below is a quote on page 14 from a publication titled, "Anomalous Heat Generation during Hydrogenation of Carbon (Phenanthrene)," http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomaloushb.pdf

Quote from: MizunoTanomaloushb
With this technique, unlike electrochemical cold fusion, there is no electrolysis power or other
direct input power. The only input is to the heater, so once high-temperature triggers a reaction,
all of the anomalous heat is self-sustaining. The reaction could be sustained without electricity
by insulating the cell to maintain the temperature, but this would make it difficult to control the
temperature.

GB

LENR is not cold fusion, it uses the weak nucleur force, http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg272847#msg272847

This is the real deal.  It's mainstream now.  Lets get busy to replicate.

GB

Quote from: fznidarsic on January 28, 2011, 12:48:44 PM
I don't know, but I hope to play a small part in this unfolding story. 
Time will tell, however, I want things to happen fast as I am getting old.

Frank Znidarsic

Znidarsic,

Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story.  Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital

A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.

Some properties:

1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion,  <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.

2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).

3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,

4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.

I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nuclear force.  If my memory serves me correctly, I believe you have previously stated the weak nuclear force isn't understood very well.  I think it's time for us to begin to learn more about this weak nuclear force.  If you disagree, please express your opinions here.  The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way.  I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to hear where you stand on all of this.     

Thank You,

GB

Quote from: gravityblock on January 31, 2011, 06:51:59 AM
Znidarsic,

Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story.  Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital

A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.

Some properties:

1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion,  <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.

2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).

3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,

4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.

I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nucleur force.  If you disagree, please express your opinions here.  The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way.  I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to here where you stand on all of this. 

Thank You,

GB

Energy wise this can be useful in splitting water with low energy and collecting it as electricity with a fuel cell.

Phonon resonance could also explain how freddy can run a car on hydrogen. I believe his electrode tubes are tuned to a certain acoustic frequency.

I would rather much see someone else making gold first to at least prove that phonon resonance works.

Even though the math, process  and science is open to this extraordinary achievement it's amazing to see how naive Joe Champion is.

http://www.drjoechampion.com/

Apparently he's about to mass produce gold. When you can mass produce almost any metal from another abundant metal dirt cheaply then you will cause a serious disrupt across the entire corrupt economy that is based on scarcity.

What's the point for precious metals if they are mass produced by the tons weekly. I always admire people who explore science on their own but I get baffled by the shear ignorance that comes with it about current world affairs.

Putting mass produced gold behind a vault won't magically solve all our problems. What will is applying this technology into practical solutions. Cheap gold conductors, cheap platinum fuel cells, cheap neo magnets...