Quote from: tinu on April 23, 2012, 03:07:05 PM
Although I frankly admit Mr Ioannis Xydous is presenting a theory somewhat more educated than myself, since we've come to discuss basic blocks like light speed in electrostatic fields, please note that experiments for testing it were proposed (and probably conducted) long time ago. Here is one link: http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0703/0703271.pdf
I've never heard of any experimental confirmation... Do you?

Keep up the good work here,
Tinu

I believe there is experimental confirmation at this time based on overwhelming experimental observations.

1.)  Photons are slowed down inside superconductors.

2.)  The speed of light is slowed down in the electronic structure of the atom to a velocity of 1,094,000 m/s (the quantum transitional speed) which has been observed in LENR's, anti-gravity, and other experiments which can be found by researching Frank Znidarsic's work.

3.)  IBM has created a chip that can slow down light, the latest advance in an industry wide effort to develop computers that will use only a fraction of the energy of today's machines.  The chip, called a photonic silicon waveguide, is a piece of silicon dotted with arrays of tiny holes. Scattered systematically by the holes, light shown on the chip slows down to 1/300th of its ordinary speed of 186,000 miles per second. In a computer system, slower light pulses could carry data rapidly, but in an orderly fashion. The light can be further slowed by applying an electric field to the waveguide.

3.)  At the microscale, an electromagnetic wave's phase speed is slowed in a material because the electric field creates a disturbance in the charges of each atom (primarily the electrons) proportional to the electric susceptibility of the medium.  This isn't the best example, but how can we have an electric field without having a medium which is made of matter?

4.)  IMO, Dr. Stiffler's SEC experiments may suggest light is slowed down in an electrostatic field, which can produce a broadband of frequencies in multiples of 1,094,000 Mhz.  This is my own interpretations of what is being observed and I will agree it doesn't qualify as confirmation, but it is a possibility.

There's overwhelming experimental evidence of light varying in speed inside an electrostatic field.  It's in the literature everywhere.  But, is this confirmation or not?  You could always argue it's not 100% confirmation, but I will accept at this time that light does vary inside an electrostatic field until an experiment proves it wrong.

Gravock

Quote from: Gwandau on April 25, 2012, 07:57:11 PM
Dear Teslaalset and e2matrix ,

please illuminate me on this interesting Pirelli Athanor Cell and its relation to LENR.
What makes this electrolysis cell with a plasma arc equivalent to a LENR device? 

I'm sorry, but I seem to be ignorant of any nuclear reaction happening here.

Gwandau

I am not an expert and just posting some news that may be related.

My personal view:
At the cathode of such setup hydrogen is formed at the surface of Tungsten particles.
This allows diffusion of hydrogen ions into the Tungsten lattice.
Increasing the voltage between cathode and anode such that sparks occur could bring the hydrogen ions within the Tungsten lattice into a more instable situation which could trigger fusion.

Quote from: tinu on April 23, 2012, 03:18:15 PM
Indeed Rossi claimed that but some honorable observers (I can't recall exactly who did that but it's written down) reported that inside the control box were only passive electronic components (like capacitors etc) and rectifiers.
IMHO:
1. It's quite a trick to generate radio frequencies with passive components alone, don't you think?!
2. Why rectifiers when the only clear purpose is to resistively heat the core?!
Therefore, I'd take that claim of Mr Rossi with a grain of salt...

Best regards,
Tinu

Yes, it's quite a trick to generate RF with passive components alone, but it's possible with Dr. Stiffler's "Passive Spacial Energy Coherence" (PSEC) device when it's tuned to a natural frequency and is in a coherence mode.  Here's a Ring of Fire Quad Coil generating an ultra-bandwidth of frequencies over a 400 Mhz range.  That is even more impressive.  By using three coils, a diode, and small capacitor a circuit is constructed that will oscillate and build to a point of powering LED(s) with no battery and no transistor. Is this passive enough for you?

Gravock

Quote from: gravityblock on April 23, 2012, 12:42:26 PM
A common method used to produce fullerenes is to send a large current between two nearby graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere. The resulting carbon plasma arc between the electrodes cools into sooty residue from which many fullerenes can be isolated.  A cheap source would be from candle soot, then we could coat the metals with the fullerenes where the dissociated hydrogen pair can bind to the carbon atoms during the hydrogenation process.

Here's a patent on isolating fullerenes. It mentions that fullerenes in soot (contained in a quartz vessel) can be evaporated by microwaves in seconds. The fullerenes gas (brown stuff) then condenses on the walls of the vessel (United States Patent 5458742)

Gravock

Here's a website with videos of a Nano-dust fusion reactor using a quartz vessel with microwaves and fullerenes.  Nano-dust fusion publication.  Nasa has filed for a patent using Nickel and Carbon.  The carbon is more than likely C₆₀ or fullerenes.

Gravock

Quote from: gravityblock on April 26, 2012, 07:21:11 AM
By using three coils, a diode, and small capacitor a circuit is constructed that will oscillate and build to a point of powering LED(s) with no battery and no transistor. Is this passive enough for you?

Gravock

The above link isn't correct.  Obviously nobody gives a f**** or somebody would have noticed a bad link.  Here's the corrected link even though nobody is clicking it, Powering LED(s) with no battery and no transistor.  This forum is a waste of time.

Gravock