Quote from: Gwandau on July 01, 2012, 09:03:24 PM

An what kind of person are you, who strikes down upon free science research instead of being encouraging?

he is a troll... a propagandist, a paid disinformation agent.

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:08:02 PM
You have no problems with compromising your integrity and making logical fallacies yourself, do you Wilby?

denied... you wouldn't know a logical fallacy if it jumped up and bit you... this is just another red herring attempt to change the subject. changing the subject is not a cogent response milelow...

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:08:02 PM
How do you equate my promise to answer with data on the upper limits of what an ecosystem can take.  They are not necessarily the same thing, are they?  You are pathetic in the lengths you will go to in search of an argument, little logical fallacy boy.

Maybe some dirty talk in Latin after this session will get you off.

you need two 'things' to equate anything...   read the post where you were asked the question you promised to answer and tell us all what follows after he asked you if you knew something the rest of the world did not. again tu stultus es...
are you going to answer or not? you did promise...

YOU are pathetic in the lengths you will go to engage in logical fallacy...


let's recap...

Quote from: Gwandau on June 29, 2012, 07:34:35 PM


MileHigh,

that's quite a statement.

Do you have information that the rest of us here on earth does not have?

Then please give us data on the upper limits of what an eco system can take before breaking down.

The whole world will be thankful for your knowledge.

Gwandau

to which you replied...

Quote from: MileHigh on June 29, 2012, 08:45:40 PM
Gwandau:

I can easily answer your question.  However, let me turn the tables for a second, I promise to answer it later.

Gwandau:

I have told you many times, there is no independent third-party validation of Rossi's claims and the narrative associated with Rossi smells like it is a con job.

I am giving you my truthful impressions.  My impressions could have been very positive if Rossi delivered the goods.

Right now, I have very little hope that Rossi will be completely vindicated on December 31, 2012, or on December 31, 2013.

I am giving you the straight goods based on my life experience and technical background and common sense.

Here is an example of some common sense:  You can't set up a factory that's supposed to produce a million complex energy producing devices per year without some awareness of this project making it onto the Internet.  It's IMPOSSIBLE in this day an age.  Even small town newspapers have web sites.  Just that fact alone is a very serious hit to Rossi's credibility.

MileHigh

Wilby,

The question is not the literal question that Gwandau posed.  In addition, Gwandau's question is just a loaded rhetorical question that nobody can answer.

The real question asks how life is quite robust and relatively immune to stresses put on it.  And Gwandau and Chess implicitly answered that question themselves because they implicitly conceded that we are in fact not at risk of devastating and wiping out most of life on Earth unless we find alternative sources of energy.

That is my whole point, that talk of destroying most of life on Earth is just talk with no substance.  The Sun is powering the carbon cycle and it's inconceivable that any force created by Man could sufficiently interrupt the carbon cycle to cause a massive loss of life on Earth.

We know from the fossil record that there have been massive die-offs in the past and certainly Man was not responsible.  The Earth eventually recovered and new species developed.  This is all due to the fact the Sun pours thousands of trillions of billions of watts of power onto the Earth and life has evolved to take advantage of that resource.

So you can go masturbate in the corner now troll-bitch and close your eyes and recap tonight's fights while you wank.

MileHigh

more logical fallacy?  LMFAO why am i even surprised anymore? 

@all: take note of what happens when you feed a lying troll.

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:36:21 PM
Wilby,

The question is not the literal question that Gwandau posed.  In addition, Gwandau's question is just a loaded rhetorical question that nobody can answer.

so you were lying when you said you could easily answer it and promised to do so after you 'turned the tables for a second'...

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:36:21 PM
The real question asks how life is quite robust and relatively immune to stresses put on it.  And Gwandau and Chess implicitly answered that question themselves because they implicitly conceded that we are in fact not at risk of devastating and wiping out most of life on Earth unless we find alternative sources of energy.

no, that's you propagandizing again trying to squirm away... the "real question" is crystal clear in the record. furthermore, your 'argument' that what can be asserted without evidence, can be denied without evidence can just as easily be applied to your claim as it can be to chess' or gwandau's... and the reciprocal of that is also true. what can be denied without evidence (sound familiar? hint: it's your modus operandi) can be asserted without evidence.

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:36:21 PM
That is my whole point, that talk of destroying most of life on Earth is just talk with no substance.  The Sun is powering the carbon cycle and it's inconceivable that any force created by Man could sufficiently interrupt the carbon cycle to cause a massive loss of life on Earth.

inconceivable? not really, in our hubris we have slowed the rotation of the planet with dams... so again, inconceivable is only your rather limited opinion... unless of course you have some incontrovertible evidence to present that supports your asinine false dilemma... i'll wait.

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:36:21 PM
We know from the fossil record that there have been massive die-offs in the past and certainly Man was not responsible.  The Earth eventually recovered and new species developed.  This is all due to the fact the Sun pours thousands of trillions of billions of watts of power onto the Earth and life has evolved to take advantage of that resource.

of course man wasn't responsible... he didn't exist yet. and yet all of this is just more red herring...

Quote from: MileHigh on July 01, 2012, 09:36:21 PM
So you can go masturbate in the corner now troll-bitch and close your eyes and recap tonight's fights while you wank.

MileHigh

so again... put up or shut up you lying troll.


and cue the lying troll's next logical fallacy in 3... 2... 1...