Quote from: TinselKoala on June 21, 2013, 04:32:47 PM
I, for one, certainly hope someone records it, because I am not going to beg for an "invitation" to her open-source webcast, nor will I disrupt my schedule to match hers. Especially since I doubt strongly that anything will be shown at all anyway, or will be of any significance even if it is.

TK,

As well, I will not be watching live.  If it were to show up on YouTube I might have a look...

From what she has written recently, I thought she was preparing to plead ignorance and just throw her team "under the bus", blaming the errors and her arguments on them and their bad advice.

Personally, I hope she does duplicate FIG3 with the scope set to DC showing +12 volts to the gate of Q1 with no current flowing thru the CSR all the while claiming everything is connected as per the schematic.  To do so will require deception and will only demonstrate just how far she is willing to go rather than admit to an error. 

Although she does not understand how Q2 is turned on, she is well aware that applying +12volts to the gate of Q1 should indeed turn Q1 on.  One only needs to look thru the locked threads to see that she fully understands this mode of operation (it is about the only one that she does).

Again, SHE KNOWS that +12volts applied to the gate of Q1 must turn Q1 on and cause current to flow thru the CSR, unless Q1 is defective, disconnected, or not connected as per the schematic.       

To present FIG3 without realizing the error it contained the first time around was one thing, but to purposely present a similar waveform and claim it accurately reflects the schematic would stoop to a whole new level of shame. 

PW
   

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 21, 2013, 05:06:13 PM
So I personally discount the AC-coupled hypothesis as an explanation for the Figure 3 scopeshot.

TK,

Apparently you misunderstood me.

I was not saying that AC coupling in some way explains FIG3.  Due to her insistance at one time that FIG3 was not correct because the scope needed to be AC coupled, I thought she might try AC coupling one or more scope channels and play with the FG settings a bit until the waveforms "appeared" similar to FIG3, even though they would of course not be.

She has to decide if she believes FIG5 is correct, which does show current flow when the gate of Q1 is made positive, or if she actually believes that FIG3 is correct, which does not show current flow even with +12volts applied to Q1.

She already knows which figure is correct.  Many times in the locked threads she acknowledged and reiterated that when the FG output was a positive voltage, Q1 is turned on.  During all the futile attempts to teach her how Q2 is turned on, she never once had a problem understanding how Q1 is turned on.   

One can only guess as to why she cannot admit to so obvious an error as Q1 not turning on in FIG3.


PW     

I just posted in the comments a reply from Rosemary to some of the issues you been raising here, not sure why she does not post reply's herself.
Mark


http://revolution-green.com/2013/06/20/rosemary-ainslie-overunity/

Quote from: markdansie on June 21, 2013, 10:13:09 PM
... not sure why she does not post reply's herself.

I know why. In the true spirit of 'open source', she doesn't like an open discourse with critics. She's above that. Like her peers Einstein and Feynman, she simply doesn't post comments on those blogsites. She delegates that task.

Quote from: markdansie on June 21, 2013, 10:13:09 PM
I just posted in the comments a reply from Rosemary to some of the issues you been raising here, not sure why she does not post reply's herself.
Mark


http://revolution-green.com/2013/06/20/rosemary-ainslie-overunity/

She can't post comments here because Stefan has banned her. More than once, actually. If you want to see why, look at her last few posts on the old locked Tar Baby thread.

And none of her critics will post on her forum because of her censorship, her harvesting of IP addresses and her habit of going back to old posts and removing them or editing them to change their meaning. This habit of hers is why I always take screenshots of the posts she makes that contain important Little bits of information. She can't alter those, and if she accuses me of altering them the burden of proof is upon her.... as usual.
Poynt 99 can post there but.... shall we say..... Ainslie and "poynty poynt" have a special relationship.