@point99..(you see im a good troll)..are you telling me she,s got no ferrite or iron bars,rods wrapped round in coils there in that latest circuit

Quote from: profitis on June 30, 2013, 11:18:20 PM
are you telling me she,s got no ferrite or iron bars,rods wrapped round in coils there in that latest circuit

That is correct.

Quote from: markdansie on June 30, 2013, 11:16:48 PM
Just posted today by someone who knows Mr Weir, and someone who I total trust.
I am not technically qualified so will not comment.

They had a lot of trouble just operating an oscilloscope. They went off the air for more than an hour apparently because they were shocked and awed that biasing Q1 in its linear region resulted in oscillations. The demonstration completely refuted her claims concerning Figure 3 from Paper 1. When a functioning Q1 gate was biased Q1 indisputably conducted as shown by waveforms both early in the demonstration and collected near the end of the video.[/font]

[/font]
http://revolution-green.com/2013/06/20/rosemary-ainslie-overunity/#comments

Thanks, Mark.
Is that a statement from Mr. Weir himself?
What does he say about what Ainslie said he said?

I hope everyone enjoys my video demonstrating what they found so stunning. Their consternation at seeing Q1 oscillate proves that nobody ever operated that circuit with the full six batteries in the over two years since the last demonstration, and further, that not a one of them knows their topic well enough to be interpreting data, much less trying to describe and demonstrate it. Note my highlight clip linked above, showing that the presenter cannot even find a simple frequency, in over five minutes of fumbling around with a five thousand dollar oscilloscope.

Profits:

Yes I know what inductive heating is.  It would appear that you are drawing a connection between your false belief about inductors allegedly drawing in heat from the environment and inductive heating.  In fact there is no connection at all between the two.  I will go out on a limb and state that it's ironic when you suggest that I need to go to school when I assume that you haven't been to school yourself.

QuoteOr what happens to the entropy of the magnetic dipoles after they jolt  into same direction?or what happens to the entropy of the dipoles after they snap back into their original positions?

The above is pseudoscience talk and I can't make any sense of it at all.  Like TK stated, feel free to start a thread with your ideas and perhaps they will be debated on that thread.

We are dealing with Rosemary's proposition which in itself is pseudoscience derived from an amateur trying to make very difficult-to-make measurements and then leading herself down a garden path and bolstering it with her amateur theories about the nature of the magnetic field.   The real participants in this thread want to finally close the door on this one and move on and we should stay focused on that task.

Another comment for Rosie:  Write down the 12 steps in a notebook and reference the notebook as you make your next clip to keep yourself focused on the task at hand.

MileHigh

@milehigh well if somebody had told me earlier that theres no magnetic cores involved in the ainslie circuit i wouldve shut up ages ago because then theres no way for a 2nd law breach to occur in her latest circuit.however,now that you,ve gone and challenged me on my thermodynamics lets just say that im perfectly aware of the heat exhaust cycle from the battery channelled straight out a paramagnetic inductor core after alignment of dipoles,followed straight afterward by the sudden instantaneous drop in temperature as the dipoles get a sudden rude awakening to the departure of current in the coil and proceed to undergo even more alignment and give off a brief 2nd puff of heat to the environment and then suck back in the 1st(from the battery)and 2nd(from the dipoles themselves)waves of exhausted heat as they return to the prior random equilibrium state.you see,its two heat cycles going on here concurrently.not one.