http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLqM7FRMeZ4

Transcript: (DM = Donovan Martin, RA = Rosemary Ainslie

DM: I effectively mm mm met Rosemary in about 2000, round about then, and at that time the instrument that was available was the (unintelligible), a, it's not here today, it's one with a real wound element is effectively roughly as I recall 8 winds, in fact, just to digress it's the one in Quantum magazine, the referenced there (?).
And um effectively what it was it was a wound coil around this ceramic core with a platinum-based thermocouple ahm, mounted in the center. The objective behind the test was simply not to scrutinize measurements. That's a matter of  opinion always. That's always easy to argue measurements on the scope, from one scope to another, one can argue for days and years to come. Ahm, knowing that, ahm, I think what Rose has been trying to achieve, up to, to now was ah to show some of the waveforms which at times obviously could be very difficult. Because of the simplicity of the circuit, makes it very difficult to obviously _achieve_ certain fine settings. And ahm, going back, back in history what was done back then  was simply a Joule test, and of course Joules doesn't lie. Ahm, there was a control circuit, I'm sure everyone actually, watching (unintel) moment is probably aware of what was done... there was a Control, and then there was the actual Apparatus that was tested against the Control. And in every single instance it outperformed the control by Days. And this obviously was monitored (?) recorded by our local CSIR, and of course BP, and I think it's actually made mention, (unintelligible) I happened to witness the original test at the time as well.
Now the Apparatus has left for California many years ago, and never returned, unfortunately. Now you can take my word on that. (?) ABB Labs, and ahm (unintelligible) up to today, no word, other than the three scientists who originally ah, witnessed the test, and vetted the results were fired two-three months therafter.
So. In the interim there was a second device, which was built, because one was wont to do that. Ahm, the device again was tested, um, at this point, interest was lost. In, in this particular device. Um, to the point where BP actually offered a bursary through our local university

RA: (Hisses) SASOL

DM: Er, SASOL rather. Ahm, offered us bursaries, (to take it?) further. No one unfortunately came to the fore, to take up the challenge. And it's been ahm, it's been a passion of Rosemary's since then. Remember, for her it's not about the electrical circuits, it's about her Field Model, in terms of what she's trying to achieve ...
(end transcript)

Well, that pretty much clears everything up...NOT!  I think this proves that none of them know what they are talking about.  As most of us should have learned as little children, if you tell so many lies, it is very difficult to keep up with them...much easier to tell the truth.

Now she is insulting Groundloop?  He has been nothing but helpful in any posting I have ever read of his, and I have read many of them.  His suggestions had nothing to do with her circuit(s) yet she tries to use this to distract from the fact that her many variations of her circuits do not work.  Sure, blame Groundloop.

Little Miss Mosfet should stick to her curds and whey and stop insulting a lot of good, smart, hardworking folks on this and other forums.

Bill

Methinks the lady doth protest too much. Her memory is also conveniently short - or - perhaps her claim that she doesn't read responses is true.  Her latest post:

Quote
Where among a slew of nonsense he also states...

Note her reference to Glen again. She lies when she says he has tried to hide or cover up _anything_. Glen's entire corpus of work is freely available in the excellent collections he has put up for anyone to see. He includes complete raw data, scopeshots, operating parameters, everything. Long videos of running, even. For Ainslie to claim that Glen has hidden or covered up ANYTHING of his work is an absolute lie and an insult to a careful and honest researcher.

Perhaps, dear reader, you could take the trouble to check this Scribd link for yourself.  http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

This was the paper published by open source collaborators where I was nominated 'first author'.  Scroll down to the data that was published in support of the argument.  Then tell me what data you actually see.  From where I sit I see repeated reference to the statement ... 'Sorry.This person moved or deleted this image'. The same thing from Test 1 through to 13?  I think it is?

If that is our Little Pickle's best sample of Glen Lettenmaier's  'complete raw data, scopeshots, operating parameters, everything' ... then it falls rather short of LITTLE pickle's further statement that 'For Ainslie to claim that Glen has hidden or covered up ANYTHING of his work is an absolute lie and an insult to a careful and honest researcher' begs a certain want of EVIDENCE.  I can PROVE that he's removed his data.  LITTLE TK can only ALLEGE that he has not. 

And conveniently forgotten, from her own forum:

Quote
Rose,

I already had posted this in your "debunking" thread, but I guess it should be here as well since it is about Glen's results:

- The IEEE submission at scribd:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

- The Panacea compilation:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/lx2nnz9dnpg34tt/Rosemary_Ainslie_COP17_Heater_Technology.pdf

- Glen's livestream site with links:
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment

- Glen's skydrive site with all the test data etc.:
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=6b7817c40bb20460&id=6B7817C40BB20460!120

So as you can see Rose, all the results from all of Glen's tests are readily available to anyone. It took some sleuthing on my part to find Glen's cache (which he ended up giving me anyway), which I found on my own from a post of yours on EF actually.

Click on the last link above and you can directly download Glen's results from test #13 (or any other)...

As poynt99 says all Glens result are available to anyone.

Tseak , as the troll queen Ainslie says,

QuoteLet me see if I can explain this in words of one syllable - or as few as is possible.  Maybe that way you'll understand me better.

All of Glen's results are, as you pointed out, available at his Skydrive site and others. Every bit of his data, including spreadsheets, is there.

Unfortunately for the idiot troll queen Ainslie... they are in .zip folders, and SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO HANDLE THEM.



This is equivalent to receiving a letter in the mail and not being able to figure out how to open the envelope. Par for the course! Ainslie blames the sender for using an envelope she doesn't know how to open. The Troll Queen insists on remaining ignorant, blaming others for her ignorance, and then lying about it. She claims Glen's data is unavailable.... and it is unavailable TO HER because she refuses to correct her own willfull ignorance. But everybody else with a computer on the planet can Google "zip files" and know, in ten minutes, how to deal with them. Not Ainslie! She prefers to persist in her delusional lying fantasy that Glen is trying to hide something! When it is perfectly clear to everyone that he is not.

Glen (FuzzyTomCat) removed his data from the fraudulent Scribd manuscript because he knows that Ainslie's claims are false!

Now... aren't you understanding Ains-lie a LITTLE better now? Once again, she has made post after post of lying allegations, challenging me to provide evidence WHICH I HAVE ALREADY PROVIDED several times. Will she admit she has been ONCE AGAIN PROVEN UTTERLY AND COMPLETELY WRONG in her ridiculous claims and allegations? Of course not, she's way too LITTLE a person for that, she will simply continue on insulting and lying with every post she makes.


Hey AINSLIE.... are you having a LITTLE trouble understanding what the word PUBLIC means?

Here are some more images that might allow one to understand Rosemary Ains-lie a LITTLE better: