Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 74 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

RMatt
I am curious, why do you want to use ic's to build a driver oscillator?

Im not against it entirely because it may become a required component but I dont think the original idea required it to function as it was intended to operate simple resistive and inductive loads according to time period. Inductive loads are indicated in both types which I believe was the timing device in the form of a free wheeling motor placed on the output side. Because in a state of self acting a balance would have to exist between the oscillation of the load/s and the original source of power used to start it in order for it work as a self runner. In operation if the load circuit being the induced had a quantity of  current circling were viewed as one half and the source plus the inducers were viewed as the other half. If the two were equal then adding more into the magnetic field of the inducers would not be needed. A difference in potential would hopefully not exist or be so so small that it would be practically zero. The only part I can see which has a way to be minipulated  is the magnetic filed. One of the ways to make a stronger magnet is to provide more turns of wire without increasing current. A stronger field will provide greater induced current on the output. So a up close Nat's ass view of everything going on in time on the load circuit is next because unless you can find exactly when and where to connect magnetically or electrically a step up function to retard the voltage potential so there is no difference between load and source even at the fraction of a second the current switches from + to - in the cycle.
   Let the arguments begin!
A snapshot of time. One load, two wires, an alternating current. Are we going to use high and low voltage potentials or pressure and vaccume ,ying and yang ,black and white whats the flavor of the day everyone can agree on to describe the activity?
   Regardless of your designation for it, there has to be a greater and lesser in order for the "it" to flow from one place to another. There has to be an accounting for the distance the volume the resistance to the movement/flow when applicable.
   Another argument I would like introduce is friction. Friction is a form of resistance which restrict the movement or flow of something. What is it that is being consumed when movement or flow is restricted? Is a restriction invincible ?
   In a snap shot voltage is at a higher potential on one wire and lower on the other with a restriction in between. The restriction can be in the form of a poor conductive element or a long section of wire condensed into a small space to accumulate a strong magnetic effect in that small space ie a magnet. Agree or disagree so far?

RMatt

Hi Doug,

Hanon was looking for signals which did not change polarity between +positive and -negative,  and were out of phase. The links I gave above could possibly give him the signals he was looking for.
That is why I listed them, if that is alright with you?

Bob

Schiko

No way Bob, they are in search of something sacred. ;D
Something we mere mortals can not understand.  :-[
Mr. Figuera said (it's so simple that even a child can build).  8)
I say (people with preconceived ideas fail to understand or build).  ::)

It's all a joke on people, do not take it seriously ok, remember that we are all in the same direction, maybe different ways, but the direction is the same.  ;)

Happy new year to all!

RMatt

Thank you Schiko,

We all have to have a little fun every now and then, lol. ;D

Bob

Doug1

The first thing I said I was not entirely against it using a modern sound generator to make the signal.
  Am I looking for something secred ? ,no I wouldnt say that. Im sure some person will be able twist it that way to discredit any functioning method or design. Much like the buzz word "conspiracy" has effected investigative reporting. Anything can be discredited by those practiced in the art of.