Wings,
Very interesting old news snippet. Where did you find that?


I have an intuitive believe that there is indeed a possibility to break the law of energy conservation. Call me mad if you want. Free energy is bad for business and businessmen made the rules. J.P. Morgan, David Rockefeller etc., these guys rule trough control of energy, this is true.


Anyway, thinking about permanent magnet motors, there has always been the lack of being able to turn a magnet off in the right moment. But you know what? You can turn an electromagnet off! You can store its magnetism in an electrical charge and turn it off that way. The electrical charge is then useable by the next electromagnet, with few losses, but you already got the work of the last one, eg. done by attraction. So there is a logical gain.


Going out of phase with one primary could achieve a similar effect. It's all about timing. If this were a motor, let the attractor always be ahead of the rotor. This doesn't require more magnetism than  any sticky point, it's just a timing issue, that can be solved with an inductive delay. And an electromagnet becomes permanent when you short circuit it in magnetized condition. So basicly this is a permanent magnet that can be turned off.


The same applies to solid state generators.


Today I tested my generator with a steppermotor controlcard, "smc800", this is for centronics printerport, so I had to reactivate an old laptop.

Unfortunately my prototype has bad dimensions. Only 2.1 ohm in each primary, so I again had to use resistors to make sure not to draw too much current from the SMC800.

Finally, the voltage on the primary was only -.44 to .44 V, so (0.88*0.88)/2.1= 0.368 Watt consumption on each primary, 0.73w in total. The output was rectified and smoothed by a big cap, the cap went up to 25Vdc, when measuring the amps with the digital meter (the one with defective AC measurement), it read 80 DCmA, so that may be 2 Watt output.

The SMC800 was run with up to 1000hz and NRamaswami was right, higher frequency brings better output (well, not radio frequencies of course).

I am not sure if these measurements are all correct and I have to say, the smc800 is using amplitude synthesis that had a sawtheeth by its own, maybe 10khz, that I can clearly hear when I run it with silly speeds like 0.2 hz , amusingly even these frequencies, that are not my sinus amplitude, generate pretty high currents, although I have no idea if these are out of phase in one primary, obviously they are, because as I know, otherwise the output would be cancelled out completely,

I will try to find a better "driver", a steppermotor control card, powered by a pc supply, plus a laptop, just to generate 2 Watts, that's bulky. I'd rather have some smart transistor pcb that runs from a 9volt dc source. I will however build my next prototype with about 17 ohms in every primary, that's much more practical.

Regards

Well I've got two almost identical bifilar coils I can use for primaries and another I with 4 windings on it I can use for the secondary, this will allow me to use the primaries two windings in parallel or in series depending on what works better R and L wize and the secondary I can wire up in a few ways for differing resistances and inductances. The cores are insulated steel wires, 10 Gauge.

I can use a dodgy two phase generator to get two phases of DC "lumps" 90 degrees out of phase without diodes I think, if I wire it up correctly, or I can just use diodes.
Of course no matter what the result or how i present it, won't make any difference to anything anyone thinks. So I wonder why I would show anything unless it was OU.
Would there be any point to showing the experiment if looks like it is OU but when measured up correctly it isn't ?

Anyway I'm interested to see what happens so I'm going to do it even though i am in the process of trying to get a result from a magnet switching setup.

Cheers

Quote from: dieter on March 03, 2014, 08:12:42 PM
Wings,
Very interesting old news snippet. Where did you find that?

Regards

in the book see this Farmhand post:
http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg390602/#msg390602
lot of ideas   
https://ia700302.us.archive.org/16/items/inventionsresear00martiala/inventionsresear00martiala.pdf[/font]

Hi Gyula:

Many thanks for your insightful reply. Hectic work day and week this week and I will post briefly.

1. The 3 core coil was the insulated 3 core cable. Whichever way we wind ( you suggested two ways) the efficiency drops after one forward and one backward. In fact we find that when more than 3 wires are wound as trifilar or quadfilar, the best efficiency is achieved only in two layer coils. After that impedance goes up so much.

2. Am I right in the understanding that a low gauge wire with high DC Resistance will also have very high AC impedance. In that case a multifilar low gauge wire will not simply allow current to pass through if we have number of layers or would allow very little current to pass through though it will suffer a lot of heat and may even burn out due to heat. Still it will produce magnetism in the core. Am I right in the understanding. But such wires must be avoided to prevent them from burning out. Is this correct..

3. Even with 4 sq mm thick wires we have heat issues. Of course all my wires todate are insulated commercial wires not enamel coated coils.

4. So my understanding from your posts is that the rules or equations of Electromagnetism in books would not apply to the following situations.

a. Where the wires are insulated.

b. Where there is a gap between the wires.

c. Where the two or more core wires come in thick insulated cables (which further incrase their capacitance and hence consume more amperage.. Am I right here in this assumption)..

..I'm learniing a lot here. Thank you so much. I'm very obliged and grateful.

Hi Gyula:

By the way I have no bobbins. I use plastic tubes which are 2.5 inch or 4 inch dia and 30 cm to 50 cm in length for winding the wires. Each one of them is packed with softiron rods. 2.5 inch takes about 60 of 6mm dia soft iron rods while 4 inches one take a lot more. Soft iron rods are about 43 cm long. or 30 cm long. All cores are either soft iron or made up of iron powder which is packed in to the tubes with plastic caps on both sides. 99% of the time we do not use iron powder. All winding is by hand so far. No machine winding and no enamelled wire so far.