Chess, its quite obvious to you and me, and a number of others here, that anyone with their technical abilities would be putting that knowledge to good use...instead of spending countless hours trying to discredit everything and anyone.

The only conclusion left is that that is their job.

They try to present themselves as keenly analytical and logical, but when called on their behavior, all ther faux logic and common sense goes out the window...and you get the following:

The shill retreats to his position of making his baseless unproven claim that Meyers is a fraud right after I provided 2 classic examples of cabal manipulation of courts and witnesses.

He attempts to redefine 1 of those examples as "Trying to tie Stanley Meyer's bogus claims to conspiracy theories about 9/11."...while failing to come up with a false scenario to account for the remaining example.

And in his desperation, he reveals his cabal connections by discrediting all the legitimate structural engineers who came forward to to expose the official lie of 9/11, by offhandedly dismissing them as conspiracy theorists.

Where did his reasoned logic suddenly go ?

The answer is, he never had any to begin with, he's just an actor...and a bad one at that.

There hasn't yet appeared a shill that I couldn't break down to its essential elements.

Regards...

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on August 26, 2014, 09:23:09 AM
Chess, its quite obvious to you and me, and a number of others here, that anyone with their technical abilities would be putting that knowledge to good use...instead of spending countless hours trying to discredit everything and anyone.

Then your imagination could be less limited.

Quote

The only conclusion left is that that is their job.

It is the conclusion that you have preconceived.

Quote

They try to present themselves as keenly analytical and logical, but when called on their behavior, all ther faux logic and common sense goes out the window...and you get the following:

The shill retreats to his position of making his baseless unproven claim that Meyers is a fraud right after I provided 2 classic examples of cabal manipulation of courts and witnesses.

If B is a member of A, it does not mean that all A is B.

Quote

He attempts to redefine 1 of those examples as "Trying to tie Stanley Meyer's bogus claims to conspiracy theories about 9/11."...while failing to come up with a false scenario to account for the remaining example.

You alleged two conspiracies and then attempt to boot strap one from the presumed existence of the other.

Quote

And in his desperation, he reveals his cabal connections by discrediting all the legitimate structural engineers who came forward to to expose the official lie of 9/11, by offhandedly dismissing them as conspiracy theorists.

LOL, now you are just completely misrepresenting.

Quote

Where did his reasoned logic suddenly go ?

It is still right here for all to see.

Quote

The answer is, he never had any to begin with, he's just an actor...and a bad one at that.

Sure, there are monied interests who just quake in their boots about message boards.

Quote

There hasn't yet appeared a shill that I couldn't break down to its essential elements.

At least that is what you say.  I wonder if you have convinced even yourself.

Quote

Regards...

Its too late for this shill folks, he already risen for the 9/11 bait trap I set for him.

He referenced 9/11 conspiracy theories, when we all know the only conspiracy lies with the perpetrators...the very same people who pay for his activities here - the cabal.

He can slice and dice all he wants...but, he's exposed himself once again, and there he sits, with all four limbs firmly embedded in the tar baby.

Regards...

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on August 26, 2014, 12:13:57 PM, when we all know

It might be a good idea if you speak for yourself only.

    Look at the combustion process closely.  Methane use is simple.  ch4+O2 yields co2 and h20 .  It is called a hydrogen bond replacement- producing excess thermal energy inside a closed vessel.  It causes molecular motion.  Obviously if we had a process on board that took carbon dioxide and water and produced methane and oxygen then shipped it over to the engine and ignited it the car wouldn't move.  This is not what happens in an engine.  The hydrogen combines with oxygen FROM THE ATMOSPHERE.  The carbon combines with oxygen FROM THE ATMOSPHERE.  The temperature rises and nitrogen and oxygen FROM THE ATMOSPHERE combine to form nitrates..    That is why Myer's  buggy ran.  That is why all engines run.  They exploit the energy stored in the oxygen molecules  FROM THE ATMOSPHERE.  The engine simply increases the temperature of the fuel until the atmosphere burns.  The gasoline engine causes a spark to cross a gap.  All this bullshit about crazy temperatures.  The uv from the spark gap is intense.  Intense and at ionizing frequencies.  This "ignites"  the fuel heating process.  The ionized and accelerated electrons cause secondary molecules ionization and hydrogen bonds are broken all over the mixture.  This releases monatomic hydrogen-which forms hydrogen gas which captures ATMOSPHERIC oxygen to form water.  Formation of water is exothermic last I knew.  This heats up the fuel.  Now it becomes easier and easier to thermally ionize molecules and cause exothermic reactions that will not occur at lower temperatures.