you sound kind of married  , anyway... Nobel? Are you serious? As in Nobel Dynamite, Military Industrial complex? You must be kidden. They would never give a prize for OU.
Excess heat from LENR is pretty much verified today and yet, the establishment completely ignores it, still calls it pathetic science. Pons and Fleischmann were ruined, embarassed, destroyed... Jim Patterson and his Grandson are dead (Patterson Power cell, Pd covered Beads..,)


OU woukd destroy the elites sick little dream of world enslavement. They would never allow that.


All honoured, established, successfull people are part of a criminal establishment. Esp. in the energy sector.


Nobel prize ... lol   

Correct dieter.yet mr sarkeizen imagines they will liberaly just handover a prize

Quote from: dieter on December 23, 2014, 03:42:20 AMExcess heat from LENR is pretty much verified today

Yawn.

a) Excess heat is better stated as "heat of unknown origin" most likely experimental error.
b) Who elected you decider of what is "pretty much verified".
c) profits hasn't said that he has a "pretty good verification".  He has said that he has a proof that is beyond any possible reasonable doubt.

Quote from: profitis on December 23, 2014, 02:58:54 AM
Those are your odds yet you take the bet in the first place? You're a strange gambler mr sarkeizen.

Why is that odd?  I have very little to lose here.

QuoteYet you lose 5000 if I DONT get a nobel.so if I don't get a noble arent you going to say'hey you didn't get a noble becoz your evidence was underunity so I'm not gona giv you the 5grand?

Nope.  I get that like almost everyone here your mathematical abilities are worse than an eight year old.

I pay out if you get published (in the way agreed upon) and you don't get a Nobel.  I believe the probability that you are correct is incredibly close to zero and the probability of you getting published and not getting a Nobel to also be vanishingly small.  Hence the risk of BOTH events occurring together are even smaller.  So again, my risk is lower than crossing the street.

Quote
'Evidence for Spontaneously reversable thermodynamics in concentration cells' how does that sound @sarkeizen? I may aswell just copy karpens original journal publications,polish,re-arrange them a bit and submit them right?

Well you might consider using a spellchecker.   As long as it completely and unambiguously claims the clear existence of OU.

Quote frm sark:'Why is that odd?  I have very little to lose here.

End quote

5000 is little to lose?

Quote frm sark:'I pay out if you get published (in the way agreed upon) and you don't get a Nobel.'
End quote

I think YOU want a career boost via association and you want to let me take the risks of being the fall-guy by going for a noble correct mr sarkeizen?

Quote frm sark:'well you might consider using a spellchecker.   As long as it completely and unambiguously claims the clear existence of OU.'
End quote

Thanks for pointing that out bud I'l definitely get spelling organised yes (: