Electro-magnet comparison   


When the "Electro-Magnet" is pulsed, the same field is generated in the coil wether there are permanent magnets attached in attraction or not. The difference is; The permanent magnets reinforce the "Flyback", and invert and transform the output. 100 Newtons of EM force with an equal force in permanent magnet Gauss, will double the "Flyback" as an A.C. sine wave of transformed voltage. The permanent magnets don't act as a resistance against the EM field. The EM field simply fills the available space around them. Flyback load has no effect on input. The EM input is in no way affected by the attached magnets, but the "Flyback" is strengthened. This BEMF output has been carefully measured by the tester, and when built like the prototype, returns the equivalent power of the input pulse. Naturally, a piezo transducer would deliver a C.O.P. of 2. This is a "Free Lunch"!


The BEMF output from the oscillator with the laminated stator only and no magnets attached is a pulsed D.C. of half the power.

                                                  Submerged ballon metaphor.

Submerging an air filled balloon will increase the air pressure in the balloon. Attaching permanent magnets to an electro magnet in attraction will increase the "Implosion Pressure" of the BEMF in a similar fashion when current is interrupted. Magnet attraction strength compared to depth of air ballon submergence.


It doesn't cost anything just to stick a permanent magnet on an Electro-Magnet.

                                          Magnet increasing flyback

This is a high water mark video: The tester refers to the "Sweet Spot"; This is where the permanent magnet Gauss matches the magnetic core and coil strength. The increased brightness does not increase input draw.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRnN7DeYHvU

I believe that it might be possible simply to connect the Oscillator BEMF storage capacitor in parallel to the battery source, like "Luc's" circuit and disconnect the battery positive as Luc does and have the Oscillator continue to self run as Luc's Toroid. I haven't tried this yet, but If it performed that way and generated piezo output, there'd be no reason to ever want to turn it off.

                                                         Belanger's self runner

Look how nearly identical Marc's circuit is to Luc's: Take notice of the magnet and central positioning in adjacency to the twin counter wound coil intersection:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOh1aeIFBXU


Both these circuits power self runners but neither generates any physical force from the magnet field oscillation! In both circuits the permanent magnets reinforce the flyback to a level above the input power. I believe the physical oscillation of the magnet armature acts as as secondary feed back.