What are you talking about? Playing more games here I see. I answered all your questions and you never answered any questions. Now you divert with more questions. Why not answer the simple questions G?
What scientific results? I already told you. Anyone is welcome to do real science in the real world with themselves or together. That is what I do all day long G. Maybe you just play with people online in fantasy land. I don't know. You are not willing to commit to what real science is. So far you have not even explained what you mean by science. You are using a word that means something is verifiable. But somehow you assume that can be done online. The forums are only for information sharing.
Anyway, why not answer the question G? Everyone know why G.

Quote from: gyulasun on July 03, 2019, 01:00:49 PM
Thanks for the answers.  Rick blames me not being scientific and whenever I ask for scientific results I am refused.
Why is that ?

By the way, this is an open forum.  I did not know about giving information for money is the habit for you.

Gyula

Everyone can see the few guys here that are playing on words in the hopes that future readers will just superficially read over the words and think such a thing was said. They know if they just do this day and night for years that they will drown out people and then superficial people will read it and conclude it must be true. I mean really, that was an obvious deliberate twisting. This is really dirty. This is really desperate measures. Interesting to see what is next. It is suppression overtime now people. The lies have been exposed and much truth has been shared. Hurry, get all the disinfo people on here and drown out the truth, because we don't want people reading those things. Well, I have collected and organized everything so it will not be lost, and it will not distract anyone as these people have tried to do.

Quote from: a.king21 on July 03, 2019, 01:09:51 PM
There you go twisting my words. I do not charge for information. I think you have some issues, or you are being paid to impune free energy research.

That's fine Itsu, I could see this. I haven't really read much of your posts since I read them near the beginning. There are plenty of things you can do. There is no reason you have do anything I have shared. But I suppose that if you don't do anything significant then G will claim something is proven by it. 

Quote from: itsu on July 03, 2019, 01:15:01 PM
Gyula,

i do not read Rick's long posts, nor see his long video's, i just don't have the stomach for it.
I bravely start reading or looking, but after a few sentences or minutes i am lost and have to give up.

Its probable me as i have the same with most of AG his posts.


Most if not all i know from my present setup came from Benfr and A.king21 as they were feeding me snippets from posts and video's.
Not ideal, i know.


Anyway, i am glad we are on the same wavelength and have been for years.

I will try to do some sympathetic resonance frequency tests with more then 2 overcoupled coils and involve
temperature tests to see if anything gets cold.


Thanks,   itsu

Yes,
I showed the fan and guys like this took the credit. Whatever, so long as people can see the gains. Well, I guess since you posted a video link here and it gives confirmation of OU, then G has his conditions for a claim fulfilled. The truth is that thousands of people all around the world are using these fans. People have run with this. So I am very happy. One guy makes his entire living in Europe selling these. That's truly amazing considering that the power meter proves that you can't charge a battery with it, or that a cap takes 15 minutes and hardly gets up to 1V 

Quote from: a.king21 on July 03, 2019, 01:41:46 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMQqnaWUA98


I assume this is related to Rick's energizer technology  -for those who have never seen the video.

Yeah it is actually all very involved in what I call the near near field. You are dealing with a bunch of factors that are not just waves but capacitance relationships. If you consider Tesla's perspective, then the two inductors are really two plates of a capacitor. Don Smith's L1 and L2 also can be looked at that way to. But here we can almost place the secondary coils in any position (if you move it in and out that can change). I say there is about 70% of the area around the transmitter but if you turn it in that void area it can also find an angle that powers it. The diagram you have is just a simplified view. Added to that are environmental influences and reflections and capacitance relationships. This is what I bring up in the book, and why I use the one LED as it is easy to make very small changes and see the differences. It's fun to learn this. And it is good to learn it without high power so you are not radiated. 

Quote from: seaad on July 03, 2019, 03:25:09 PM
Coils at all angles.

==> ITSU, (all)
Some thoughts on a small test regarding coils in all directions:
I assume that Rick said.
A coil can be a receiver and a transmitter at the same time.
In my simple ugly picture below, I give an example of this.
Normally, coil A can't transmit energy to coils C, D with these mutual coil directions.
First test that with coils A + C + D so that the LEDs on C, D do not lit.

The ellipses roughly show the energy propagation.
But coil A can transmit energy to coil B. (red ellipse)
Thereafter, coil B repeats energy (blue ellipse) to coil C which transmits energy to coil D (purple ellipse).
This can of course be completely up in the "blue" 

- Maybe the test has to be redone with other angles between the coils to work?
- Maybe a re-transmitting of the energy from coil B may only occur with a certain kind of load? (LED resistor, ETC)

Regards Arne