Strategy Ruminations

[Omnibus]

@someother,

I'm away from my laptop right now and I can't have PSpice on the iPad so this is only from memory. Go to the upper left corner of your initial PSpice screen and click on the small icon serving to change the parameters of the simulation. There you'll see the initial and final time as well as the time increment. Set the initial time to 1.25us and the final time to 2.5us. Set the time increment to 1.25ns. Now, when that's done and you carry out the simulation the data should be contained in 1004 cells (from cell 2 to cell1005). It is very important to study just one period because due to smallness of the current values averaging over larger arrays will incur greater error and the outcomes won't be comparable. Remember we're talking about data processing with a digital machine and the errors when handling small numbers can be huge. Now, there will be an error when processing 1004 points as well but it will stay the same for all different voltage offsets that you'll be studying and therefore you would be able to compare the various outcomes. Notice, the effect is real, as seen from the theoretical argument, but because of the digital errors it's absolute value would be somewhat skewed, as would be any time we do measurements with digital scopes. Fortunately, at this instance we're not so much interested in the absolute value of the effect but as to whetheror not  there's an effect al all. That's the big deal here. In addition, I guess the skewedness due to the errors incurred by the digital machine won't be that substantial to merit any notice at this point.

[Omnibus]

@teslaalset,

You don't need to multiply by the time t. Comparison of the powers is enough. So, just calculate the Ii*Vi and Ii*Ii*R in all 1004 cells and then average them from cell 2 through cell 1005. Finally, find the ratio of the averaged data and you're done.

[WilbyInebriated]

Omnibus,

I've looked at and simulated Sandy's circuits quite some time ago, and there is no OU to report in the simulations.

.99

[teslaalset]

@teslaalset,

You don't need to multiply by the time t. Comparison of the powers is enough. So, just calculate the Ii*Vi and Ii*Ii*R in all 1004 cells and then average them from cell 2 through cell 1005. Finally, find the ratio of the averaged data and you're done.

You may have missed my latest edits.
That's exactly what I also suggested

[Omnibus]

On the contrary, there is OU and I've proved it, as is seen. You, on the other hand, are incompetent and therefore should stay out of this discussion.