Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

Hey Mr Wayne,
The forum still waits for your "hitting the ball out of the park" demonstration.
Where are you and your group on that demo?
Will this be a private demo, via special invitation only or will you be web casting for all of the world to see?
Such an event should be shared with your fellow mankind.. Don't you agree???

I have been following since May 2012.
Are you any closer to demo'ing a self runner ?
Dave

Hello Dave,
In all your posts - you have had a level head - I agree with you.
Please recall that our first Demo back in May of 2011, it was a simple input and output system - only three layers and we demonstrated that the additive effect of the Pressure differentials were sound - and yes,   they matched Larry's spread sheets.
It was the first stage of an over unity machine.
In November of 2011 we demonstrated that original three layer unity self running - Over unity closed loop.
In the year that has passed since then - we worked way to long and hard to turn that model into a closed loop system that also converted the excess energy to electricity as well as gather Data throughout the system and all of its function.
In hind site - that was partially a waste of time - balancing budgets - meant we needed to reuses what we could. Reusing that three layer system was a mistake to accomplish all the goals - but we did get to use the Data to develop our Optimized systems.
And all of the work we did was very useful to gain the knowledge of mechanical limitations speeds and flow values.
I asked the group to regroup and decide if we should abandon the ZED, or build the optimized system -
More engineers joined the fight -
Timing was great,
We had new engineers who lent valuable effort to the cause - you see the design is not the problem - it is how do you use it.
With these additional engineers volunteering, Greece, Switzerland, Four from the USA - all helping to answer the question - can we make this little model meet all the demands we have on it?
The independently analyzed the system and agreed - YES - but barley - well barely was where we were at - and even with
a fueless system running over unity and over coming all the exchange losses - I did not see anymore value in it than the last demo.
SO I asked the group to optimize our design to "Hit it out of the park"
p.s. (I do not care about the barking dogs and their demands - I want what is right for the people helping and the needs the machine can meet).
For over thirty days I reviewed optimizations and designs - none were impressive enough, within the requirements they were given.
So I pulled out the next Model - it uses the same unique discovery - but with a unique input method - and I asked ten of the engineers to run numbers on it (COP).
We built three little models and used the data to verify the engineers.
The most conservative engineer came to me in a low voice and said "this is unbelievable - I am as conservative as I can be and you have a COP of 13."
I said to him, then design me one to build with enough output to "knock it out of the park" - and we built that one.
Our original COP on the finished model was 11, not bad since we can not slope the input (with my budget).
After my head engineer evaluated the system - he said double the input system to add more control and more options.
And we did.
Now Larry - has worked tirelessly on this system, along with our head engineer - with evaluations COG, Mass momentum and other things we have to deal with.
Currently we are running tests on using the New model to run the ZEDS, and we are also developing different output systems for the new model.
(I have no time for invisible unicorns and demands by people to show them something)
But this Web site has enabled many good men to bypass the unicorns and come straight here.
We had a Physicist Join today.
So we are setting up for the best ball game ever.
Now My wife has been very ill - so that has kept me close to here and I decided to see if anyone wanted to discuss the technology - and its merits. But alas - no takers, Red may be right.
All or nothing..........is all I hear............... I think our team deserves the rights to our release... enough said on that.
Dale, we are on steps of the release - do you know what will be said about all the truth I just shared -
TK and his ponies will say see see .... he admits he does not have anything - it is pure ignorance - all or nothing.
I know becasue they do it every week.
They will ignore again that we have had verified Over unity for more than a year. As they have for over a year.
p.s When I am wrong - I am quick to sit down.
If there is more than two ways to do the same thing - I do not see a need to argue.
I will not beat a man down because I do not agree with his politics or his faith, or lack of it.
And the scientific method has served us well - I encourage our detractors to start using it.
Thank you for being respectful - even if I do not provide exactly what you seek.
Yesterday I described myself as a chained up dog... a dog because I am loyal, chained up because I will not lie to suit my needs, the rocks are being thrown are the lies - those that think it is fun - are sick.
I will send Stefan Marks Next video, for those like you.
Wayne Travis
President
HydroEnergy Revolution LLC
mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com

[minnie]

Hi,
    I've been giving this one some thought as I do my ordinary work.
I had an idea with a combustion engine to do away with a crank, in practice I didn't think much of it in the end.
It may however work on a gravity machine. Say you had  a long stroke and with permanent magnets on your rod
which would then pass through coils, you might be able to produce a linear generator? Do this on several cylinders
and you should get a steady flow.
   This should get round the horrific losses involved in hydraulics-electric conversion.
                                                                        John.

[TinselKoala]

I did what you have not and yet when you can not argue the science, the math, you all go after the man,, what fucking ignorant morons you all are,, period end of story.

I've given you more REAL math analysis here than anyone else, Webby, thanks to minnie's great questions. I and some others have argued the SCIENCE until we are blue in the face, because you and Wayne are out of your depth when it comes to thermodynamics and energy and work and all the rest of that.

What "FUCKING ignorant moronic" claims have I made that need proving, Webby? The claim that he paid you two thousand dollars? You are the only one who can prove that, I suppose, I am just going by what YOU told me.

I've claimed that Wayne is a liar: and every time he refers to his "Patent" he proves me right.
I've "claimed" that he does not now have nor ever has had a 20 kW unit. Actually that isn't a claim at all, it is a demand for Wayne to prove his claims. I'm not the one making extraordinary claims here, fucking ignorant moron Webby.

And it is YOU who are going after the man here, fucking ignorant moron Webby. Or the Koala, rather.  I have asked for Wayne to prove his claims and he hasn't been able to do so. Have I attacked his character, called him a psychopathic fucking ignorant moron, insulted his family tree, made up bad poetry about him? No, I have not. I have called him a liar when he lies, and I have challenged him to prove that he doesn't lie about his HDPE system.

So again, FUCKING Webby, what FUCKING ignorant moronic claims do YOU claim that I've made?

[TinselKoala]

To the rest of you, TK and the rest are saying that you are to stupid to make up your own minds and they are protecting you from your own stupidity,, how does that make you feel???

That's a lie Webby and you know it. Shame on you.

Or do you have a link to where I said that anyone is "to" stupid to make up their own mind? Of course you don't.

[TinselKoala]

Hey TK,
Glad you have free time,
Have you answered these questions yet ?
"this time use two jars of water - and have most of the air in the first jar then let the air flow equalize - Does it matter that the two bodies of water are not connected, what is the common link that controls and causes the effect - Now raise one jar above the other - what happens? lots to learn here."
Still waiting.

Wayne

Yes I have answered, Wayne, and if you would read my posts you would see that I answered you already. What are you waiting on me for? YOU are the one who is always late. 50 kW at the church in three months ... and that turned out to be a year or more ago ...... I laugh at you.