another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

NOW.  If that much is clear - then let me propose our own interpretation - FOR DISCUSSION.

Effectively what has happened - possibly as a first in the history of electronics - we have engineered a circuit that is not POWERED by the potential difference at the supply - BUT by the circuit components - all on their own.  BECAUSE, during that oscillation it is IMPOSSIBLE for the battery to deliver any energy at all.  The circuit is simply NOT THERE to conduct any current from that battery supply. 

Which is brilliant.  Because that means that the energy that is self-evidently 'sloshing about' as TinselKoala likes to call it - is most assuredly NOT the result of a the transfer of energy as this transfer is understood within the standard model.

And it would have been even MORE brilliant had we designed this deliberately.  We freely confess.  It was a design flaw - AND, NEEDLESS TO SAY - the fault was predictably and ENTIRELY my own. 

Which is also why we've presumed to 'press on' with the proposal that this is all very good news.  Because the results are consistent with a magnetic field model that CONFORMS to the standard model in EVERY RESPECT - saving the proposal of a magnetic dipole as the 'carrier particle'. 

Kindest again
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

No comment?  Poynty? 

I've made some really challenging claims here.  Are you conceding this argument?

Regards,
Rosemary

[poynt99]

No comment?  Poynty? 

I've made some really challenging claims here.  Are you conceding this argument?

Regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary,

May I remind you that I work full time and that I am on the other side of the globe? I am at work right now, just decided to check in here. I can't always be near my computer during the day, and nor should I be.

[poynt99]

You have advised us that a CORRECT measurement is only possible if the probes of the oscilloscope are placed directly across the battery terminals.

Correct.

WE HAVE DONE THIS.  REPEATEDLY.  NO CONNECTING WIRES OTHER THAN THE CIRCUIT WIRES. 

If you will indulge me, I will make a drawing of your setup and would ask that you identify precisely where the probes were located.

Yes I understand that you have TOLD me this already, but I want to SEE it visually on a diagram which I will provide and number for convenience.

Until I SEE where you have identified the measurement points on a build diagram, I can not be assured the correct measurement points were used.

Do you agree to identifying the measurement points on a diagram I will provide?

[poynt99]

A simple test to prove the battery voltage can not and does not fall to 0.5V.

Take the load resistor out of your circuit and place it DIRECTLY across one (or all) of your batteries. Meanwhile, have a DC voltage meter DIRECTLY across the battery terminals.

NB. The load resistor must be connected DIRECTLY to the battery (or batteries) with no more than 18 inches of heavy wire.

Note what the battery voltage was before connecting the load, and what it is after connecting the load.