another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

And so it goes guys.    At least we now know who are the protagonists and who the activists in this drive to over unity.  Hopefully the day will come when these  'protagonists' for want of a more respectable title -  will be accountable for their well rehearsed skills at flaming these threads of mine.

Again, regards,
Rosemary

Right, or wrong, Rosemary? ANSWER THE QUESTION. Go ahead..... make me look stupid by PROVING ME WRONG on this matter.

"Do the math." 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Right, or wrong, Rosemary? ANSWER THE QUESTION. Go ahead..... make me look stupid by PROVING ME WRONG on this matter.

"Do the math."

I have REPEATEDLY answered this.  And I will not do so again.

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

An open letter to Stefan Hartmann:

Stefan: I have repeatedly shown how Rosemary Ainslie's claim is based on incorrect math and incorrect understanding of power and energy units and their relationships. I have cited her own words and shown specifically where and how her calculations have been done incorrectly. The correct calculations, based on her own data, show that the claim that she makes is FALSE. I have asked her to either justify her calculations and show that she is correct and I am wrong, or to correct her calculations and RETRACT her claim of overunity performance and her application for the various prizes that you and Prof. Jones are offering.
The fact that she refuses to do either of these things, yet allows the claim to stand uncorrected in spite of the manifest fatal errors, shows that she is engaging in wilful scientific misconduct. The fact that you are allowing this claim to stand, unchallenged and uncorrected, indicates a certain lack of rigor on your own part. I believe that you have sufficient understanding of mathematics and energy/power calculations to see for yourself, by reading carefully and performing your own calculations, that her claim is unsupported by her data.
I sincerely hope that you consider the effect on the FE community that results from allowing FALSE CLAIMS to stand without correction.
Regards--
TinselKoala

And Guys,

When TK relies on an admitted 'miscalculation' to encourage Harti to ban me - then you know we're looking at a crisis of concern.  The 'trolling' is getting frantic.  Go figger. 

Again,
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

I have REPEATEDLY answered this.  And I will not do so again.

Rosemary

Nowhere do I detect an answer to the questions I have asked about your calculations and your statement that a Joule is a Watt per Second. But presumably you mean to say this:

"YES, I stand by my claim and my calculations as presented in the quote. And a Joule is a Watt per Second."

Is that a fair statement of your position, or not?

[TinselKoala]

And Guys,

When TK relies on an admitted 'miscalculation' to encourage Harti to ban me - then you know we're looking at a crisis of concern.  The 'trolling' is getting frantic.  Go figger. 

Again,
Rosemary

Where did you "admit" to a miscalculation in the quote? Don't you realize that your "miscalculation", when corrected, INVALIDATES YOUR CLAIM? Are you admitting then, that your claim is invalid?

Good. We've finally gotten somewhere. I expect you to make a clear retraction, in so many words.

And where do I encourage Stefan to ban you? I want him to make you TELL THE TRUTH and ADMIT YOUR ERRORS, for a change. Banning you would be too easy.