Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[frankidel]

Salut Pascal, je me rend compte que sur ces forums, beaucoup parlent et personnes ne construisent, votre set-up semble très intéressant et en plus en francais, au moins je comprend.  merci pour les infos, continue ton bon travail.  tu sais il y a de l'avenir avec des scientifiques comme vous.  bonjour du québec.

[Pascuser]

Merci!
Oui je suis très déçu par ces forums qui ont l'air remplis de mous qui ne font pas grand chose à par demander qu'on fasse tout pour eux. Un forum décevant de plus. Pour LA grande référence en la matière, ça donne une image de la nullité ambiante de l'ensemble du travail underground à ce sujet.

Heureusement l'ensemble du travail n'est pas à l'image du travail individuel de certains. Si vous êtes intéressés par cette thématique, vous savez où aller dans les zones en français. Quant à moi je quitte cet endroit inintéressant pour mon sujet et je vais aller poster ça ailleurs en anglais où d'autres travailleurs cachés existent peut être. Ici c'est de la confiture pour les cochons comme on dit (je ne sais pas si vous avez cette expression au Québec aussi?)

[conradelektro]

You are never happy with what you have. When I say that there is COP, you say it is not shown. When it is shown, you say it is useless.

Richard VIALLE made the U autogenerateur running in a loop with no consumption of input batteries, so YES there is a practical way to generate so much overunity that you can use it to compensate all input energy dissipated in the driver circuit. I yet wrote it many times.

The self running version was delivering constant 10W output power and no depleting batteries for many months.

And YES there is a way to have much more power, like Richard VIALLE showed it accidentally with 10 centimeters of spark on the input.

@Pascuser:

You are making the most extraordinary claims (like Richard Vialle running an apparatus with no power input for months), but you do not show proof.

With all OU-devices it seems to be the same: in the best ones there is some hint (like your measurements), but the real self running machine never materialises.

You should not expect people to believe an OU claim. It goes against all things known so far.

Being angry is not productive.

If some one claims OU, the burden of proof is on him. You can not turn this around. Demanding that people build something does not solve your problem to produce irrefutable proof.

Yes, in the end, you have to be able to install somewhere a working device. In fact, you will have to show many working devices before someone takes this seriously. If you can not do that, you will not be believed.

You are just one person amidst thousands of people since more than a hundred years who claim to have an OU device. You have to see yourself from this perspective. How can anybody know you or Richard Vialle are the real masters who have done the most extraordinary thing in recent history? Just step back for a moment and then you will see, how others see you.

Richard Vialle is doing his thing for decades. Why has no working device materialised? There are understandable problems. But the people here can not solve them for you.

Greetings, Conrad

[Pascuser]

blabla bla bla.... and bla bla bla...


Showing proof...:(I showed!!!! It just happened that you DON'T EVER read messages, I have made videos to show, but you can't read what iw written, too busy in chatting on the internet)
DOING NOTHING: YOU DO NOTHING!!!!

blabla bla bla....

I can't expect more from somebody only chatting on the net!

"Greetings"

[xenomorphlabs]

Big COP has been measure with equipement I have not. I have no HF wattmeter nor physic test equipement of an official measurement institute.

But with a poor equipement you can have COP>300 or COP>500 as I got.

If you aren't interested of COP>1 process and need COP>10 000 measure to be interested, I can't do nothing.

Loop system has been described but I did not realize it myself beacuse electronic must be designed to have a low loss (because you have 10 watts only outoutting) oscillator+ pre-ampli+ampli and that costs a little. I have done affordable things: using the lab materiel I have.

Big COP have been measured at an official institute. What can be done is to give you the adress where the measurement was done. Do you wait that I buy such equipement for your pleasure? I am not a millionnaire. You can do like me and having hundreds of COp with little investment.

And you can design your own powering electronic device to have a loop if not convinced of your measurements. I have not designed such an electronic. But Richard VIALLE has had sponsors who did it. Their powering electronic is their intellecual property and will not be given; but it is not something weird: normal oscillator+ pre ampli+ ampli. I did not design it because it cots about 1000$ to design it as a self running system. For what? For a loop. But it will not give something more than a loop with 10 watts.

What is more interesting is to have more output power, so the loop will be easy: using output power to power lab material.

Anybody claiming proofs and demanding to have me or anybody buying material to have so can wait eternally. All is given here so everybody can do it himself and measure himself. If one is not satisfied, he can buy himsel material to measure or go to his local physic institute to bring his built replica and have his proof.

I am here to spread what has been made by Richard VIALLE. I made him myself, and one of his friend too. We verified that it worked are our mission on earth is not to satisfy everybody asking to do this or that to have their proof. I present what we get, honnestly; we did it with individual money and time and if you want to be fed with your ideally proof, you can provide yourself; I can't do more.

This is a working forum for people willing to work on project, this is not a drive service "please the proof, with film, reports, and hurry". We give what we have. You want to reproduce or test by yourself: it is great. You want more than we have: you won't have. if you want things like you want, do it yourself! YOU can test, measure and see. schema is affordable to reproduce for somebody with lab material (oscillator, generator , amplificator). If you have so it will cost additional 30$ to design the system, if you don't have, then see those who will do it. I myself could'nt do many things because I have not the material.

Dear Pascuser,
could you please ,like you kindly proposed ,give the address of the institute that made the measurements ?
I want to write them a letter about their test series concerning the device.
Thank you in advance