Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

Hi bajac,
Which do you think would work better? Doug1's thoughts about  N, S, and Y, or what is in Patrick Kelly's ebook.
(Clemente's work is in chapter 3)
http://www.free-energy-info.com/PJKbook.pdf

Hi Rmatt,

I can say you that all the info included in Patrick Kelly´s ebook abouth the Figuera interpretation was released by Bajac in one of the first posts of this thread. You can search for the pdf document uploaded by Bajac.  For new users I have searched for the Bajac´s post  (post #55) where the explanation is attached as a pdf file:

http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg346032/#msg346032


Later on, Kelly designed a circuit to acomplish the task to create the two signals in the resistor, and he added it to his ebook.

Regards

[PiCéd]

(Aïe) I probably forgot that it worked only in resonance frequency.

[RMatt]

(I am no expert in electronics, just interested in electronics for about 40 years. I did go to school for computer electronics about 18 years ago, but have forgotten alot since then. Anyway, back to the fun stuff.)
Doug stated:
"Studying the layout closely I think the Coils S and N are facing each other with the same sign pole faces."
In the ebook it shows N for North, S for South. They are alligned with N and S facing. It goes on to explain that the current rotates around the coils.
That is what I was refering to earlier.
Thanks

[bajac]

RMatt,
There is no rotation of the magnetic field or the currents in the 1902 and 1908 Figuera's devices. I do not understand why some people keep referring to a rotating field. The principle of these devices is the same transformer action used in todays transformers. A voltage is induced due to a change in intensity of the magnetic field. It does not have to rotate.
Bajac

[Doug1]

Hannon yhank you .I see where you answered my question I must of missed it.